2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Tween 80 on flotation separation of magnesite and dolomite using NaOL as the collector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the prepared infrared window tablets were fixed to the sample holder for scanning test. The scanning range of the instrument was 400 ~ 4000 cm -1 , the minimum resolution was 0.09 cm -1 , and the precision of the wavenumber was 0.01 cm -1 (Sun et al, 2020).…”
Section: Fourier Transform Infrared (Ftir) Spectroscopy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the prepared infrared window tablets were fixed to the sample holder for scanning test. The scanning range of the instrument was 400 ~ 4000 cm -1 , the minimum resolution was 0.09 cm -1 , and the precision of the wavenumber was 0.01 cm -1 (Sun et al, 2020).…”
Section: Fourier Transform Infrared (Ftir) Spectroscopy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main impurities in magnesite ore were silicon, calcium, and iron. Cationic reverse flotation was usually used to remove silicon from magnesite ore; then, anion flotation was used to remove calcium and some silicon when the content of impurities was high [19]. It is necessary to remove iron during the removal of silicon by cationic reverse flotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, these other collectors, such as an ion-tolerance collector AESNa (Liu et al, 2021), dodecyl phosphate (Chen and Tao, 2004) and DDA (Yao et al, 2016) as well as fatty acid (Matis et al,2016), have also drawn considerable attention for introducing reverse flotation for magnesite. Flotation with mixed collector, including NaOL (Matis and Gallios, 1989;Sun et al, 2020) and bis(2hydroxyethyl)dodecylamine (BHDA) , has not obtained efficient separation as those with the pure minerals. Despite modifiers, including sodium hexametaphosphate (SH), sodium pyrophosphate (Matis et al, 1988;Matis and Gallios, 1989;Sun et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2017), sodium silicate, and calcon (Matis and Gallios, 1989) were introduced, relative to pure mineral flotation, the little floatability distinction still manifested a challenging separation between the two minerals in a lab test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flotation with mixed collector, including NaOL (Matis and Gallios, 1989;Sun et al, 2020) and bis(2hydroxyethyl)dodecylamine (BHDA) , has not obtained efficient separation as those with the pure minerals. Despite modifiers, including sodium hexametaphosphate (SH), sodium pyrophosphate (Matis et al, 1988;Matis and Gallios, 1989;Sun et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2017), sodium silicate, and calcon (Matis and Gallios, 1989) were introduced, relative to pure mineral flotation, the little floatability distinction still manifested a challenging separation between the two minerals in a lab test. Additionally, among the mineral mixtures recommended in the literature, the recovery ratio of magnesite is still relatively low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%