Effect of Tubal Sterilization Technique on Risk for Serous Epithelial Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

Lessard-Anderson, Collette R.; Handlogten, Kathryn S.; Molitor, Rochelle J.; Dowdy, Sean C.; Cliby, William A.; Weaver, Amy L.; Sauver, Jennifer L. St.; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N.

doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000462919.43108.df

Cited by 22 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is further complicated by the evidence supporting that traditional methods of tubal ligation and occlusion independently decrease the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. [26][27][28][29] For now, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has taken the following position that "randomized controlled trials are needed to support the validity of salpingectomy to reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer. The approach to hysterectomy or sterilization should not be influenced by the theoretical benefit of salpingectomy.…”

Section: Surgical Tubal Ligation and Occlusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Permanent Contraception for Women

Patil

Jensen

2016

Semin Reprod Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Permanent contraception is a highly desired and commonly used contraceptive option for women around the world who desire never to become pregnant. Current methods of female permanent contraception require surgery. Postpartum tubal ligation and interval surgical tubal ligation are safe and effective, do not interfere with menstrual cycles, and require no ongoing cost or medical checkups. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion offers a less invasive surgical approach, but requires an imaging study for verification of correct placement. However, not all women have access to a surgeon trained to provide permanent contraception, or they may face other prohibitive logistic or financial burdens. The development of novel permanent contraception methods that are immediately effective and/or nonsurgical could help improve access to and acceptability of permanent contraception. The expansion of permanent contraception options could help women achieve their family planning goals and reduce unintended pregnancies.

show abstract

Section: Surgical Tubal Ligation and Occlusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Permanent Contraception for Women

Patil

Jensen

2016

Semin Reprod Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Multiple studies have shown an approximately 40% decreased risk of ovarian cancer after tubal sterilization. [34][35][36][37] The degree of protection appears to be subtypespecific with a greater magnitude of risk reduction seen for endometrioid and clear cell cancers than for serous cancer. 34,35,37 The protective effect provided by tubal occlusion persists for over 30 years following the procedure and was not associated with age at the time of the procedure, 37 BRCA status, use of oral contraceptives, and parity.…”

Section: Contraindicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Canadian Contraception Consensus Chapter 6 Permanent Contraception

2015

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The prevention of ovarian cancer was greater for high-risk serous, endometrioid and clear-cell tumors while the effect was nil for mucinous type cancer 13 . The results from a population-based study suggest that salpingectomy may confer a higher reduction of ovarian cancer risk than other sterilization methods 14 . Hysterectomy alone (retaining Fallopian tubes and ovaries) may also contribute to reducing future ovarian cancer risk 11,12 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 93%