1996
DOI: 10.1159/000259204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Trial-by-Trial Variation in Center Frequency on Detection of Interaural Temporal and Intensitive Differences in Bands of Noise

Abstract: Sensitivity to interaural temporal disparities (ITDs) and interaural intensitive disparities (IIDs) was measured as a function of duration in conditions where the center frequency (CF) of the stimuli was constant and, separately, in conditions where the CF of the stimuli was varied on a trial-by-trial basis. Stimuli were bands of noise centered at either 300, 1200, 2400, or 4800 Hz with the bandwidth of the noise being 40% of their CF. The largest effects of shortening duration and varying center CF of the sti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the additional practice, performance in the experimental session was so poor that there was a real danger of floor effects, and it was perhaps unsurprising that a one-tailed, paired-sample t test failed to demonstrate a significant difference in d' between the two types of trials, /(5) = 1.00, p -.2. Degradation in sensitivity to ITD with uncertain frequency has been found before (Grange & Trahiotis, 1996), but it is curious that higher adaptive thresholds did not compensate for this. In an attempt to improve performance, we repeated the experimental session with an easier ITD discrimination (A = adaptive thresholds + 100).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Despite the additional practice, performance in the experimental session was so poor that there was a real danger of floor effects, and it was perhaps unsurprising that a one-tailed, paired-sample t test failed to demonstrate a significant difference in d' between the two types of trials, /(5) = 1.00, p -.2. Degradation in sensitivity to ITD with uncertain frequency has been found before (Grange & Trahiotis, 1996), but it is curious that higher adaptive thresholds did not compensate for this. In an attempt to improve performance, we repeated the experimental session with an easier ITD discrimination (A = adaptive thresholds + 100).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Οι έρευνες και στα δύο πεδία γίνονται με τη βοήθεια σύγχρονων μεθόδων της Σημαντικό πεδίο της σύγχρονης έρευνας στον τομέα αυτό αφορά στην αντίληψη και την ολοκλήρωση της συχνότητας του ηχητικού σήματος καθώς και στα χαρακτηριστικά της ψυχοφυσιολογικής αντίληψής της (ύψος-χροιά) 113 σε συνάρτηση με το άλλο φυσικό χαρακτηριστικό του ήχου, την ένταση (intensity-loudness)114 . Στην μέχρι τώρα έρευνα της αντίληψης της συχνότητας και ύψους 115 ενός ηχητικού σήματος έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί συχνότητες σημάτων που εμπίπτουν στο ακουστικό φάσμα του ανθρώπου κυρίως άρτιες ως μαθηματικά μεγέθη (π.χ 500 Hz, 1500 Hz, 4500 Hz, 6000 Hz κ.ο.κ)116 . Έντονη έρευνα έχει επίσης γίνει στην αντίληψη117 και ολοκλήρωση 118 τόσο της μουσικής όσο και μουσικών συχνοτήτων (κυρίως της κλίμακας Ντο) και συνακροώμενων μουσικών τόνων της δυτικής μουσικής 119 .…”
unclassified