1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf02658404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of trapping on hydrogen permeation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 3 we show that a single permeation transient is enough to describe trapping sites. Sections 4 and 5 describe the numerical method developed here to solve (1) and (2) and present a theoretical discussion in which we establish the range of trap energies which can be determined trough a single permeation transient. Then, we present simulated hydrogen permeation transients to support this conclusion.…”
Section: Isrn Materials Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Section 3 we show that a single permeation transient is enough to describe trapping sites. Sections 4 and 5 describe the numerical method developed here to solve (1) and (2) and present a theoretical discussion in which we establish the range of trap energies which can be determined trough a single permeation transient. Then, we present simulated hydrogen permeation transients to support this conclusion.…”
Section: Isrn Materials Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [1] supplies analytical expressions for the time lag as a function of k, p and the diffusion coefficient D. However, no analytical expressions for the permeation transient (hydrogen flux at the exit side of the permeation membrane as a function of time) are given, since the presented coupled differential equations are not solved. The McNabb and Foster equations are solved numerically (finite difference method) by Caskey and Pillinger [2] and later by Thomas and Stern [3]. Simulated permeation transients are obtained for different sets of parameters D, k, p, and N x , where N x is the trap population measured either in sites per unit volume or in moles per unit volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Caskey and Pillingerl (30) have given an approximate solution of McNabbFoster's equation (4) using the finite difference method for boundary conditions appropriate to hydrogen permeation and evolution. Iino(31) (32) has analyzed the influence of reversible and irreversible traps on the apparent diffusivity, examining the kinetics of coverage of traps of possible various depths, i.e., the influence of traps of varying trapping rates and release rates on the McNabb-Foster theory (4) from the point of view that there should generally be active hydrogen traps of varying depths in steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(30) Now, we also consider a generalized expression of the diffusion flux equations for individual jumping processes due to the gradient of hydrogen concentration. All the possible fluxes can be written as follows: (31 Here, we also assume that there is a system of the low occupation probability of hydrogen in the normal and trapping sites, i.e., C1<<1, Ct1<<1, Ct2<<1,...Cti<<1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%