2016
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of transect location, transect spacing and interpolation methods on river bathymetry accuracy

Abstract: Digital elevation models (DEMs) of river channel bathymetries are developed by interpolating elevations between data collected at discrete points or along transects. The accuracy of interpolated bathymetries depends on measurement error, the density and distribution of point data, and the interpolation method. Whereas point measurement errors can be minimized by selecting the most efficient equipment, the effect of data density and interpolation method on river bathymetry is relatively unknown. Thus, this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(133 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these results highlight the findings by previous researches, particularly those of Heritage et al (2009) and Glenn et al (2016), that the interpolated river bed accuracy is not influenced by the choice of a specific interpolation method but rather by the survey strategy or configuration. The large RMSEs for the RBCL configuration and the low RMSEs for the XS configuration confirm that as the data points become evenly spaced and covers more portions of the river, the resulting interpolated surfaces become more accurate.…”
Section: Interpolated River Bed Surfacessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these results highlight the findings by previous researches, particularly those of Heritage et al (2009) and Glenn et al (2016), that the interpolated river bed accuracy is not influenced by the choice of a specific interpolation method but rather by the survey strategy or configuration. The large RMSEs for the RBCL configuration and the low RMSEs for the XS configuration confirm that as the data points become evenly spaced and covers more portions of the river, the resulting interpolated surfaces become more accurate.…”
Section: Interpolated River Bed Surfacessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Studies conducted by Goff and Nordfjord (2004) and Merwade et al (2006) have shown that commonly available interpolation methods such as triangulation, inverse distance weighting (IDW), splines or kriging yield inaccurate river bed topography. Glenn et al (2016) contended that the interpolated river bed accuracy is not influenced by the choice of a specific interpolation method but rather by the coordinate system for which the interpolation method is applied and the spacing between transects. Heritage et al (2009) also concluded that the choice of the interpolation method is less important, but argued that the accuracy of the interpolated surface is dependent on the survey strategy or configuration of data collection (Heritage et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water 2017, 9, 19 13 of 16 Figure 7 shows the DEM of the lower Athabasca River watershed. Note that the water bodies within the flood plain (i.e., data processed from LiDAR) were not included in the final DEM, which was beyond the scope of the current study.…”
Section: Final Dem Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Glenn et al [19] investigated the effect of transect location, spacing, and interpolation methods in generating the river bathymetric surfaces in the Snake River and Bear Valley Creak in Idaho. High resolution aerial photographs and multi-beam SONAR survey data were used for the Snake River, and experimental advance airborne research LiDAR (EAARL) data were used for Bear Valley Creek.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regional monthly temperature and precipitation of the study area are derived by linear interpolation of the nearest GCM data. Although it is simple, its precision is acceptable [26][27][28].…”
Section: Climate Models and Emission Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%