2008
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Muscle Stimulation and Passive Cycling Movements on Blood Pressure and Removal of Urea and Phosphate During Hemodialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results of the current study concur with three others demonstrating intradialytic exercise to have no significant effect on urea clearance [13,14,16], the results contrast with previous investigations reporting 15-25% increases in dialysis adequacy following intradialytic exercise [10,12,15,25,26,27,28]. Possible explanations as to why our study conflicts with the aforementioned positive findings include the previous use of suboptimal study designs, with varying use of control groups and reliance on observations of single HD sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the results of the current study concur with three others demonstrating intradialytic exercise to have no significant effect on urea clearance [13,14,16], the results contrast with previous investigations reporting 15-25% increases in dialysis adequacy following intradialytic exercise [10,12,15,25,26,27,28]. Possible explanations as to why our study conflicts with the aforementioned positive findings include the previous use of suboptimal study designs, with varying use of control groups and reliance on observations of single HD sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This is particularly important considering the variability that can occur between and within individuals regarding dialysis adequacy. Notably some previous investigations with positive findings [27,28] also relied on less pragmatic interventions such as 3 h of intradialytic cycling or transcutaneous muscle stimulation. Thus the current study implemented a rigorous repeated measures design to provide adequate control but was powered to detect clinically important and statistically significant effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intradialytic motor-driven passive leg cycling movements or transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulation of both thighs and calves increased P i removal by 31% (1,172 8 315 vs. 895 8 202 mg) and 34% (1,197 8 265 vs. 895 8 202 mg), respectively. This translates into an increase in weekly P i removal from 2.6 to 3.5 g with passive leg cycling movements and to 3.6 g with transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulation, effects similar in size to an additional HD treatment per week ( table 1 ) [9] .…”
Section: Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies have also reported that systolic blood pressure elevation is within 10 mmHg during NMES in patients who received hemodialysis or those who are critically ill and are in intensive care, and that no significant adverse events were observed. 28,29) Therefore, we believe that NMES can be safely performed in patients with AMI without inducing unstable hemodynamic conditions such as excessive elevations in blood pressure and heart rate, although it did enhance sympathetic activity. There are some limitations to this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%