2018
DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-17-00781.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Trainee Performance Data on Standard-Setting Judgments Using the Mastery Angoff Method

Abstract: Background Mastery learning in health professions education requires learners to learn and undergo assessment until they demonstrate a high level of competence. Setting defensible standards is key to accurately assessing educational outcomes in mastery learning. The Mastery Angoff method was proposed recently to set a minimum passing standard (MPS) for mastery learning curricula. However, it is unknown whether prior knowledge of trainee performance affects judges' decisions about setting an MPS using the Maste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17] The rigorous MPS set for this curriculum -93.3% -is similar to the high standards set for other mastery learning interventions. 18,21 While mastery, defined as meeting the MPS, is ultimately a dichotomous variable, analyzing performance by checklist score allowed for a more granular understanding of a learner's Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 6…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15][16][17] The rigorous MPS set for this curriculum -93.3% -is similar to the high standards set for other mastery learning interventions. 18,21 While mastery, defined as meeting the MPS, is ultimately a dichotomous variable, analyzing performance by checklist score allowed for a more granular understanding of a learner's Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 6…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 17 The rigorous MPS set for this curriculum – 93.3% – is similar to the high standards set for other mastery learning interventions. 18 , 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%