2021
DOI: 10.1111/vop.12896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of topical cyclopentolate alone or combined with phenylephrine in healthy horses

Abstract: Objective Evaluate the effect of repeated doses of topical 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride alone and in combination with topical 2.5% phenylephrine on pupil diameter (PD), tear production (STT‐1), intraocular pressure (IOP), digestive function (gut motility and feces production), and heart rate (HR). Animal studied: Six healthy mares. Procedures In a prospective, randomized, controlled, and crossover design study, the left eye of six healthy mares was administered 0.2 mL of cyclopentolate alone and in combinat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this study design, a cause-and-effect relationship between an intervention and disease outcome can be established [ 44 ]. According to a literature search (all publication abstracts and titles were screened), five randomized controlled trials [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] were published in the Journal of Veterinary Ophthalmology in 2021, out of 80 clinical studies (short reports and reviews were excluded). Information regarding study design, such as sample size calculation or masking, was missing in some publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this study design, a cause-and-effect relationship between an intervention and disease outcome can be established [ 44 ]. According to a literature search (all publication abstracts and titles were screened), five randomized controlled trials [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] were published in the Journal of Veterinary Ophthalmology in 2021, out of 80 clinical studies (short reports and reviews were excluded). Information regarding study design, such as sample size calculation or masking, was missing in some publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%