2015
DOI: 10.2460/javma.246.6.654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of tooth extraction on stomatitis in cats: 95 cases (2000–2013)

Abstract: Extraction of teeth in areas of oral inflammation provided substantial improvement or complete resolution of stomatitis in more than two-thirds of affected cats. Full-mouth extraction did not appear to provide additional benefit over PME. Most cats with stomatitis may require EMM to achieve substantial clinical improvement or complete resolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
87
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
87
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common reasons for study exclusion were manuscripts focusing on species other than cats (i.e., humans) as well as articles discussing treatment of other feline diseases, such as feline immunodeficiency virus, and mentioning stomatitis as a clinical sign or sequela. After assessing the included 16 studies, 4 were assigned an EDG of I ( 12 , 28 , 36 , 37 ), 3 were assigned an EDG of II ( 10 , 11 , 38 ), 3 were assigned an EDG of III ( 39 41 ), 1 was assigned an EDG of IV ( 42 ), and 5 were assigned an EDG of V ( 43 47 ). Seven studies (43.8%) were prospective clinical trials, three studies were retrospective (18.7%), and six studies were case reports presenting the outcome of one or two cats (37.5%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common reasons for study exclusion were manuscripts focusing on species other than cats (i.e., humans) as well as articles discussing treatment of other feline diseases, such as feline immunodeficiency virus, and mentioning stomatitis as a clinical sign or sequela. After assessing the included 16 studies, 4 were assigned an EDG of I ( 12 , 28 , 36 , 37 ), 3 were assigned an EDG of II ( 10 , 11 , 38 ), 3 were assigned an EDG of III ( 39 41 ), 1 was assigned an EDG of IV ( 42 ), and 5 were assigned an EDG of V ( 43 47 ). Seven studies (43.8%) were prospective clinical trials, three studies were retrospective (18.7%), and six studies were case reports presenting the outcome of one or two cats (37.5%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FCGS is a painful and debilitating severe oral mucosal inflammatory disease of cats that is estimated to affect 0.7%-12% of the general cat population [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Clinical signs are moderate to severe oral pain and discomfort, including inappetence, reduced grooming, weight loss and ptyalism [11,12,16]. Approximately 70% of cats respond to the current standard of care for FCGS, which is full or near-full mouth tooth extraction by either complete resolution (28.4%) or substantial improvement (39%) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS) is a severe, idiopathic, oral inflammatory disease of cats that is estimated to affect 0.7%–10% of the general cat population [610]. Clinical signs are moderate to severe oral pain and discomfort, including inappetence, reduced grooming, weight loss, and hypersalivation [7, 8, 11]. FCGS can be debilitating, and severely affected cats are often euthanized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally occurring diseases in client-owned animal species serve as useful animal models of human disease, as they reflect the complex genetic, environmental, and physiologic variation present in outbred populations. Feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS) is a severe, idiopathic, oral inflammatory disease of cats that is estimated to affect 0.7%-10% of the general cat population [6][7][8][9][10]. Clinical signs are moderate to severe oral pain and discomfort, including inappetence, reduced grooming, weight loss, and hypersalivation [7,8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation