2020
DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.19-0332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of titanium or zirconia implant abutments on epithelial attachments after ultrasonic cleaning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed characteristics of the implants used in the present study were previously reported [ 9 ]. In brief, two-piece implants, consisting of a Ti (Grade 2 ASTM F67) screw as an intrabony portion and a transgingival insert made of Ti (Grade 2 ASTM F67) or zirconia (0.05 wt% Al 2 O 3 -doped 3.0 mol% Y 2 O 3 -stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal, Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan), were fabricated (Sky Blue, Fukuoka, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed characteristics of the implants used in the present study were previously reported [ 9 ]. In brief, two-piece implants, consisting of a Ti (Grade 2 ASTM F67) screw as an intrabony portion and a transgingival insert made of Ti (Grade 2 ASTM F67) or zirconia (0.05 wt% Al 2 O 3 -doped 3.0 mol% Y 2 O 3 -stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal, Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan), were fabricated (Sky Blue, Fukuoka, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [387] , [388] , [389] , [390] , [391] , [392] , [393] , [394] , [395] ] Parallel observations were being made from groups investigating implant osseointegration; osseointegration was dependent on implant material, rougher surfaces promoted osseointegration, and adsorbed protein content controlled osseointegration [ [396] , [397] , [398] , [399] , [400] , [401] , [402] ]. Since then, only a handful of studies have confirmed that physicochemistry and topography control HD in vitro [ 403 ] and in rat models [ 384 , [404] , [405] , [406] ], and specifically that HD formation (in rats at least) is generally higher on zirconia than titanium [ [407] , [408] , [409] ]. Overviews of the effects of surface topography on implant soft tissue responses may be found elsewhere [ 347 , [410] , [411] , [412] ].…”
Section: Peri-implant Junctional Epitheliummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zirconia can be used in patients with titanium allergy and shows it has advantages over titanium for use in oral areas where aesthetics require the use of a material with a color similar to that of natural teeth [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. In addition, compared to titanium implants, zirconia has excellent biocompatibility and shows a lower adhesion of bacteria, thereby reducing the risk of peri-implantitis [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%