Abstract:Large eddy simulations (LES) are performed to study the wakes of a multi-rotor wind turbine configuration comprising of four identical rotors mounted on a single tower. The multi-rotor turbine wakes are compared to the wake of a conventional turbine comprising of a single rotor per tower with the same frontal area, hub height and thrust coefficient. The multi-rotor turbine wakes are found to recover faster, while the turbulence intensity in the wake is smaller, compared to the wake of the conventional turbine.… Show more
“…Furthermore, it is observed that closely spacing the rotors on a multi‐rotor wind turbine increases the loading on the blades which requires a further examination by means of aeroelastic simulation of a multi‐rotor wind turbine 7 . An aerodynamic analysis of a multi‐rotor wind turbine comprised of four rotors indicate faster wake recovery as well as reduced turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) compared to a single‐rotor wind turbine with equal swept area 10–13 . The reduction of TKE in multi‐rotor wind turbine wake has the potential of reduced fatigue loads on the downstream wind turbines in a wind farm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 An aerodynamic analysis of a multi-rotor wind turbine comprised of four rotors indicate faster wake recovery as well as reduced turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) compared to a single-rotor wind turbine with equal swept area. [10][11][12][13] The reduction of TKE in multi-rotor wind turbine wake has the potential of reduced fatigue loads on the downstream wind turbines in a wind farm.…”
An aeroelastic analysis is carried out to assess the loads on a selected quad‐rotor wind turbine vis‐à‐vis those on an equivalent rated single‐rotor turbine, with a specific focus on a comparison of support structure loads (e.g., tower root, yaw‐bearing, and boom loads). A quad‐rotor wind turbine with combined rated power of 6 MW and a single‐rotor with equivalent machine rating are modeled in SIMAPCK coupled with AerodynV15 (including turbulent wind input from TurbSim) to calculate the aerodynamic loads. A correction for tower/boom shadow is implemented in Matlab to account for reduction in (axial) incoming wind due to the presence of support structures that carry the rotors. The performance of the quad‐rotor wind turbine, with the single‐rotor as baseline, is carried out for load cases selected from wind turbine certification standard (IEC‐61400‐1) covering the following: nominal loads under normal wind speed profile, fatigue loads under normal turbulence, and ultimate loads under extreme turbulence. Results show that, comparing the quad‐rotor tower root loads to those of the single‐rotor turbine under extreme turbulence, the side‐side force is up to 31% higher, the force‐aft bending moment is up to 15% higher, and the normal force is up to 46% higher due to additional boom/nacelle inertial loads.
“…Furthermore, it is observed that closely spacing the rotors on a multi‐rotor wind turbine increases the loading on the blades which requires a further examination by means of aeroelastic simulation of a multi‐rotor wind turbine 7 . An aerodynamic analysis of a multi‐rotor wind turbine comprised of four rotors indicate faster wake recovery as well as reduced turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) compared to a single‐rotor wind turbine with equal swept area 10–13 . The reduction of TKE in multi‐rotor wind turbine wake has the potential of reduced fatigue loads on the downstream wind turbines in a wind farm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 An aerodynamic analysis of a multi-rotor wind turbine comprised of four rotors indicate faster wake recovery as well as reduced turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) compared to a single-rotor wind turbine with equal swept area. [10][11][12][13] The reduction of TKE in multi-rotor wind turbine wake has the potential of reduced fatigue loads on the downstream wind turbines in a wind farm.…”
An aeroelastic analysis is carried out to assess the loads on a selected quad‐rotor wind turbine vis‐à‐vis those on an equivalent rated single‐rotor turbine, with a specific focus on a comparison of support structure loads (e.g., tower root, yaw‐bearing, and boom loads). A quad‐rotor wind turbine with combined rated power of 6 MW and a single‐rotor with equivalent machine rating are modeled in SIMAPCK coupled with AerodynV15 (including turbulent wind input from TurbSim) to calculate the aerodynamic loads. A correction for tower/boom shadow is implemented in Matlab to account for reduction in (axial) incoming wind due to the presence of support structures that carry the rotors. The performance of the quad‐rotor wind turbine, with the single‐rotor as baseline, is carried out for load cases selected from wind turbine certification standard (IEC‐61400‐1) covering the following: nominal loads under normal wind speed profile, fatigue loads under normal turbulence, and ultimate loads under extreme turbulence. Results show that, comparing the quad‐rotor tower root loads to those of the single‐rotor turbine under extreme turbulence, the side‐side force is up to 31% higher, the force‐aft bending moment is up to 15% higher, and the normal force is up to 46% higher due to additional boom/nacelle inertial loads.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.