2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-019-01671-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of timing of diseased plant cutting, altitude and banana cultivar on efficacy of singly removing Xanthomonas wilt infected banana plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also theorised that incomplete systemicity could be due to the reduced dependence of more mature maiden suckers on parent plants (maiden suckers have their own fully developed root systems and mature leaf canopy and were hence postulated to depend less on the mother plant for water and nutrients), thus reducing the likelihood of them becoming infected via the mother plant. Ntamwira et al (2019) however observed higher XW infections in bigger suckers (maiden suckers) compared to smaller ones (peepers and sword suckers) attached to infected mother plants, challenging the hypothesis that bigger suckers are more self-reliant and less susceptible to infections from the attached mother plants. Ntamwira et al (2019) however observed a reduction in incidence of XW infections in attached suckers when artificially inoculated mother plants were timely removed, an act that possibly prevented the build-up of XW inoculum in the mother plant and wider mat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It was also theorised that incomplete systemicity could be due to the reduced dependence of more mature maiden suckers on parent plants (maiden suckers have their own fully developed root systems and mature leaf canopy and were hence postulated to depend less on the mother plant for water and nutrients), thus reducing the likelihood of them becoming infected via the mother plant. Ntamwira et al (2019) however observed higher XW infections in bigger suckers (maiden suckers) compared to smaller ones (peepers and sword suckers) attached to infected mother plants, challenging the hypothesis that bigger suckers are more self-reliant and less susceptible to infections from the attached mother plants. Ntamwira et al (2019) however observed a reduction in incidence of XW infections in attached suckers when artificially inoculated mother plants were timely removed, an act that possibly prevented the build-up of XW inoculum in the mother plant and wider mat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The outbreaks of XW underline the need for regular assessments for XW in fields managed with SDSR, whether in the early stages of control or when there is no visible evidence of XW remaining, as small outbreaks are likely to occur at irregular intervals over a period of many months. In addition, Ntamwira et al (2019) reported that timely application of SDSR (immediately after observing first symptom) was more effective for field recovery compared to a delayed application (2 weeks and 4 weeks) or no SDSR application. Timely application of SDSR not only reduces XW inoculum in diseased mats, it also prevents potential infection and/or build-up of Xvm in lateral shoots physically attached to the diseased plant.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Cdmu and Sdsr For Control Of Xwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid progress in XW is observed when sources of inoculum were not removed in a timely manner, when male buds are left on the plants, and garden tools used for de-leafing, de-budding, de-suckering and other farm operations are not sterilized after use (Blomme et al 2017a, b;Ntamwira et al 2019). So, both time and cost are also associated with the additional XW control operations of early de-budding of the male inflorescence part on healthy plants, and the sterilisation of tools.…”
Section: Impact Of Cdmu and Sdsr On Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the success of control packages e.g., the SDSR package in controlled experiments, adoption level, application intensity and correctness, and success on farms has been variable. Several factors including the timing of application, wrong application and dis-adoption of some elements of the control packages have been observed (Blomme et al, 2019;Ntamwira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%