1969
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1969.10883819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Time of Transition from Manuscript To Cursive Writing upon Subsequent Performance In Handwriting, Spelling, and Reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results agree with those of Otto & Rarick (1969) and of Early et al (1976). Both these experiments were carefully designed field experiments using standardized reading and spelling tests similar to the tests used here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present results agree with those of Otto & Rarick (1969) and of Early et al (1976). Both these experiments were carefully designed field experiments using standardized reading and spelling tests similar to the tests used here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Assuming that print-script supports the development of reading and spelling, it follows that a long print-script period is expected to give better results in reading and spelling than a short period. Malmquist's conclusions must, therefore, be taken as being in support of the positive effect of print-script on reading and spelling, by the same token, the results obtained by Otto & Rarick (1969) indicate that the initial teaching of print-script has no effect on the development of reading and spelling. The results from the studies by Otto & Rarick (1969) and Early et al (1976) weaken the empirical support for the positive effect of the initial use of print-script on the development of reading and spelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is primarily a matter of tradition since little evidence exists to support any of the widely used transition periods (McOmber, 1970;Otto & Rarick, 1969). A student's readiness to acquire a second style of writing should be determined on an individual basis rather than arbitrarily.…”
Section: Cursive Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his experimental study on reading comprehension of 4 th grade students, Tosunoğlu (2010) finds out that level of reading comprehension decreases when a different writing style is used other than the one used in writing activities and in reading texts. But in literature, there are also several studies (Otto & Rarick, 1969;Duvall, 1985;Karlsdottir, 1996) concluding that use of either manuscript or cursive handwriting does not make any meaningful difference in reading skills (cited in Schwellnus et al, 2012) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%