2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01104-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of time-dependent ibuprofen administration on the post operatory after impacted third molar extraction: a cross-over randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Purpose To evaluate time-dependent administration of ibuprofen in a lower third molar extraction model. Methods Eleven patients requiring bilateral surgical removal of lower third molars were recruited and randomized into a blinded crossover randomized controlled trial. For 3 days after surgery, the control group was prescribed ibuprofen 400 mg every 8 h. On the other hand, the experimental group received also ibuprofen 400 mg at breakfast and lunch, repla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…morning and afternoon administration only) was reported to be of potential therapeutic benefit for post-operative recovery after wisdom tooth extraction (Tamimi et al 2022). This finding was also in accordance with a recent study, published after our search was conducted, investigating the same outcomes but in a cross-over design (Pérez-González et al 2022). However, these RCTs had relatively small sample size which could influence their reported findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…morning and afternoon administration only) was reported to be of potential therapeutic benefit for post-operative recovery after wisdom tooth extraction (Tamimi et al 2022). This finding was also in accordance with a recent study, published after our search was conducted, investigating the same outcomes but in a cross-over design (Pérez-González et al 2022). However, these RCTs had relatively small sample size which could influence their reported findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%