2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Time Delay on Recognition Memory for Pictures: The Modulatory Role of Emotion

Abstract: This study investigated the modulatory role of emotion in the effect of time delay on recognition memory for pictures. Participants viewed neutral, positive and negative pictures, and took a recognition memory test 5 minutes, 24 hours, or 1 week after learning. The findings are: 1) For neutral, positive and negative pictures, overall recognition accuracy in the 5-min delay did not significantly differ from that in the 24-h delay. For neutral and positive pictures, overall recognition accuracy in the 1-week del… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies in which emotional and neutral item memory were found to differ after a delay are often limited to tests performed immediately after learning and one day later Sharot & Yonelinas, 2008). Furthermore, studies that included longer learning-test intervals often did not find time-dependent differences in accuracy between emotional and neutral items (e.g., Ritchey et al, 2008;Wang, 2014Wang, , 2018Wang & Fu, 2011;Weymar et al, 2011, but see e.g., Anderson et al, 2006. This could be due to relatively small samples (Ritchey et al, 2008;Weymar et al, 2011), or repeated testing of the same learned material (Weymar et al, 2011), which can bias results (Burke et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in which emotional and neutral item memory were found to differ after a delay are often limited to tests performed immediately after learning and one day later Sharot & Yonelinas, 2008). Furthermore, studies that included longer learning-test intervals often did not find time-dependent differences in accuracy between emotional and neutral items (e.g., Ritchey et al, 2008;Wang, 2014Wang, , 2018Wang & Fu, 2011;Weymar et al, 2011, but see e.g., Anderson et al, 2006. This could be due to relatively small samples (Ritchey et al, 2008;Weymar et al, 2011), or repeated testing of the same learned material (Weymar et al, 2011), which can bias results (Burke et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we began the title of our paper with “NEVER Forget” both to serve as a mnemonic for our model’s acronym and because of the intriguing possibility that the enhanced recapitulation for negative information could lead to enhanced storage—and thus increased durability—for those memories. To the extent that negative memories show a shallower forgetting curve than positive memories (and see Wang, 2014 for some evidence), this effect could be explained by the enhanced reactivation and recapitulation of negative memories. However, retrieval can also trigger memory modification, or deletion.…”
Section: A New Model Of Emotional Memory That Emphasizes the Importanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the present results cannot fully disclose how and by which exact mechanism preferential retention of emotional item memory was established across time. Interestingly, the majority of former studies yielding time-dependent effects on emotional item memory entailed retention intervals of at least 24 hours, thus including a full night of sleep (Anderson, Yamaguchi, Grabski, & Lacka, 2006;Nishida et al, 2009;Ritchey, Dolcos, & Cabeza, 2008;Sharot & Phelps, 2004;Sharot & Yonelinas, 2008;Ventura-Bort et al, 2016;Wang, 2014; Note. Hits = correctly recognized images of the item memory procedure; FA = false alarms to new images of the item memory procedure; SM = correctly recognized locations of items that had been correctly recognized in the preceding item memory procedure (correct source/overall hits).…”
Section: Item Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%