2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of thermo-mechanical treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of P92 heat resistant steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the specimens are normalized at 980 and 1050 °C, most precipitates are rod‐like carbides distributed along martensite laths and spheroidal carbides distributed inside the grains. Both are confirmed to be Cr‐rich M 23 C 6 carbides by SAED method (as shown in Figure e) and EDS analysis (Figure f), which is in agreement with the previous studies . It is confirmed to be [012] crystal zone axis of FCC structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After the specimens are normalized at 980 and 1050 °C, most precipitates are rod‐like carbides distributed along martensite laths and spheroidal carbides distributed inside the grains. Both are confirmed to be Cr‐rich M 23 C 6 carbides by SAED method (as shown in Figure e) and EDS analysis (Figure f), which is in agreement with the previous studies . It is confirmed to be [012] crystal zone axis of FCC structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the subgrain structure formation increased with increase in tempering temperature up to 1033 K; further increase in tempering temperature did not make any significant increase in the subgrains formation. This is due to the recovery taking place which resulted in decreased dislocation density [16] to its maximum up to 1033 K.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] The TMT process has not been extensively investigated in 9Cr steels, and most of the work has only described the enhancement of fine MX precipitation and does not compare martensitic microstructures. [15,16,26,27] Figure 3 shows the EBSD patterns of the as-processed (a through c) and the as-tempered (d through f) microstructures. The images confirm typical martensitic microstructures as seen the optical micrographs above.…”
Section: B Martensitic Microstructure After Tmt and Pre-weld Temperingmentioning
confidence: 99%