2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008jb005796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of thermal refraction on heat flow near the San Andreas Fault, Parkfield, California

Abstract: [1] Heat flow data near the San Andreas Fault (SAF) do not reveal a near-fault anomaly as expected from frictional heat generation, an observation interpreted to indicate that the fault slips at a depth-averaged shear stress <20 MPa. The data also contain large unexplained scatter, which has been a separate major issue in the analysis of heat flow within the California Coast Ranges. Here we use numerical models of heat conduction to evaluate the hypothesis that thermal refraction, due to contrasts in thermal c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulated heat flow from these model scenarios is marked by an increase of <10 mW m −2 near the fault (Figures 6e–8e). This spatial variability in heat flow is consistent with the range of observed heat flow scatter around the fault and is considerably less than the ∼40 mW m −2 near‐fault anomaly expected from frictional heating [e.g., Lachenbruch and Sass , 1980; Fulton and Saffer , 2009]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Simulated heat flow from these model scenarios is marked by an increase of <10 mW m −2 near the fault (Figures 6e–8e). This spatial variability in heat flow is consistent with the range of observed heat flow scatter around the fault and is considerably less than the ∼40 mW m −2 near‐fault anomaly expected from frictional heating [e.g., Lachenbruch and Sass , 1980; Fulton and Saffer , 2009]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Studies of processes that may mask or dissipate the frictional heat signal have focused on steady state topographically driven or buoyancy-driven groundwater flow [Williams and Narisimhan, 1989;Saffer et al, 2003;Fulton et al, 2004] and the effects of heterogeneous thermal properties [Tanaka et al, 2007;Fulton and Saffer, 2009a]. One candidate for obscuring a frictionally generated thermal signal that has not been fully explored is transient groundwater flow following an earthquake [e.g., Kano et al, 2006;Scholz, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat source increases linearly by 8.85 mW m −2 per km depth, corresponding to an average slip rate on the SAF of 3.1 cm yr −1 and an average resisting shear stress of 9 MPa km −1 over the seismogenic zone [ Lachenbruch and Sass , 1980]. We do not include radiogenic heat production, which could produce variability in surface heat flow of a much broader wavelength than that exhibited by the heat flow data [e.g., Fulton and Saffer , 2009]. …”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prescribe a constant atmospheric pressure of 0.1 MPa and an atmospheric lapse rate of 6.9°C per km at the top boundary, with a temperature of 10°C at sea level. We assign a grain thermal conductivity of 2.9 W (m K) −1 to all units to exclude the effects of thermal refraction from simulated surface heat flow, which have already been explored in detail by others [e.g., Fulton and Saffer , 2009]. The bulk thermal conductivity is computed from porosity, using a weighted average for the solid grains and the fluid [e.g., Voss , 1984]; the resulting values of bulk thermal conductivity range from 2.1 to 2.8 W (m K) −1 .…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation