2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of thermal dehydration and rehydration on Na-magadiite structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A weak third mass step of 1.2 %, at temperatures above 200 °C, was assigned to the dehydroxylation of the silicate layers that occurred at a maximum temperature of 280 °C ( Figure 5(A)). This feature was similar to that reported for the magadiite materials [4,3,36].…”
Section: Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (Tga)supporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A weak third mass step of 1.2 %, at temperatures above 200 °C, was assigned to the dehydroxylation of the silicate layers that occurred at a maximum temperature of 280 °C ( Figure 5(A)). This feature was similar to that reported for the magadiite materials [4,3,36].…”
Section: Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (Tga)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…are summarized in Table 2. The Na-magadiite exhibited a SBET value of 35 m 2 /g, close to that reported for similar materials and other layered silicates such as kanemite and kenyaite [33,36,47]. The modification with C16TMA cations led to a decrease of the SBET value from 25 m 2 /g for the partially exchanged magadiite The SEM micrographs of the starting magadiite and the resulting organo-magadiites are presented in Figure 5.…”
Section: Microtextural Studies and Specific Surface Areassupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a basal spacing of 1.54 nm corresponding to the d001 reflection was detected as shown in Fig. 1 [34]. The average crystallite size was 16.63 nm and the lattice strain was 0.0416 as deduced from scherrer equation [35].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Sncmmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is an expected result since the removal of the water molecules of crystallization is relatively easier than that of water molecules in ionic structure. That is, dehydration mechanism can be given as follows; Na2(B4O5(OH)4).3H2O Na2(B4O5(OH)4).0.75H2O + 2.25H2O (8) Na2(B4O5(OH)4).0.75H2O Na2B4O7 + 2.75 H2O (9) This result deviates by 25 % from the general belief of the ratio of 3:2 [6]. It is attributed to the fact that the removal of the crystal water is getting more difficult as it decreases in the crystal.…”
Section: Kinetics Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%