2001
DOI: 10.1002/ana.10029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of therapeutic ionizing radiation on the human brain

Abstract: We test a hypothesis that fractionated radiation therapy within a therapeutic dose range is associated with a dose-related change in normal brain, detectable by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 33 patients were examined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging to measure brain tissue spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) before treatment, and at various times during and after radiation therapy. A T1 map was generated at each time point, and radiation therapy isodose contours were superimposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 10 Gy, neural stem cells number is significantly reduced, and by 40 Gy white matter disease is prominent. 15,16 The 60 Gy dose combined parameters of tumor location, risk of necrosis, 1,2 and dose. We determined neuroanatomical target structures and what dose threshold predicted functional decline after receiving RT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 10 Gy, neural stem cells number is significantly reduced, and by 40 Gy white matter disease is prominent. 15,16 The 60 Gy dose combined parameters of tumor location, risk of necrosis, 1,2 and dose. We determined neuroanatomical target structures and what dose threshold predicted functional decline after receiving RT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barani et al have postulated the dose tolerance of the neural stem cells compartments, including the hippocampus, to be in the range of 10À20 Gy 9,10 and this corresponds to clinical observations of a threshold for neurocognitive side effects and MRI changes when doses exceed 18À20 Gy. 19 Gutiérrez et al in comparison set objectives of keeping the dose to the entire hippocampi less than 6 Gy, recognising the Figure 3. (a) Composite doseÀvolume histograms of the PTV and organs at risk for plans with a 10 mm GTV to PTV margin for helical tomotherapy (HT10; blue solid), co-planar volumetric arc (RA_1; red dots), non-coplanar 2 arc (RA_2; green dash), and non-coplanar 3 arc techniques (RA_3; blue dash).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, a standard, coplanar three field pituitary plan or non-hippocampus sparing coplanar intensity modulated arc delivery might be expected to deliver doses of 20À25 Gy to the hippocampi (Figure 1), in excess of the doses postulated to result in stem cell loss and neurocognitive changes. 12,16,19 The coplanar nature of the skull base and hippocampus creates challenges in sparing these structures without increasing brainstem or eye dose due to the limited numbers of in plane ''corridors'' to deliver dose to central tumours while simultaneously limiting dose to the surrounding OAR. This limitation applies to both HT and co-planar IMRT delivery techniques and has been noted by other authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, through the use of chemotherapy with superior efficacy in the CNS, patients with isolated CNS relapsed ALL can be treated adequately with reduced doses of CNS irradiation, and sometimes none at all. This modern approach to treatment can be expected to decrease the acute and/or late complications associated with cranial irradiation such as neurocognitive deficits, endocrinopathies, and second malignancy [13,[37][38][39].…”
Section: Lessons Learned From Past Treatment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%