2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00178-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the β2-agonist clenbuterol on the locomotor activity of rat submitted to a 14-day period of hypodynamia–hypokinesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study demonstrated the anabolic effects of low doses of clenbuterol under conditions of disuse, i.e., prevented loss of soleus weight and cross-sectional area. This correlates with the Canu et al study (20), in which the anabolic action of clenbuterol was observed in both normal and atrophied muscles. Pellegrino et al (21) also observed increased cross-sectional area of mouse soleus muscle in the presence of clenbuterol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results of the present study demonstrated the anabolic effects of low doses of clenbuterol under conditions of disuse, i.e., prevented loss of soleus weight and cross-sectional area. This correlates with the Canu et al study (20), in which the anabolic action of clenbuterol was observed in both normal and atrophied muscles. Pellegrino et al (21) also observed increased cross-sectional area of mouse soleus muscle in the presence of clenbuterol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Space flight animals and unloaded animals show similar atrophic changes in muscles and bones (Edgerton & Roy, 1996). Moreover, perturbations in posture and gait reported in unloaded rats (Canu, Stevens, Ricart-Firinga, Picquet, & Falempin, 2001;Ohira et al, 2002;Walton, 1998) are very similar to those observed after space flight in rats (Fox, Corcoran, Daunton, & Morey-Holton, 1994) and humans (Kozlovskaya et al, 1981;Layne et al, 1997). However, the behavioral motor activity has been poorly investigated in animal models of microgravity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…When comparing the effects of ␤-agonists on skeletal muscle size and strength in different animal models, it is also important to consider the mode of ␤-agonist administration, i.e., whether administered orally via the drinking water (70,181,337,351,376,423,482), via the feed (76), via a slow-release pellet (85), oral gavage (57), mini-osmotic pump (74), or via intraperitoneal or subcutaneous injection (21,117,208,209,367,411). While administration of ␤-agonists via the food or drinking water is convenient, there is uncertainty as to whether every treated animal will receive an identical dose.…”
Section: Growth-promoting Effects Of ␤-Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%