2018
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-931-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Training Set Configuration on Sentinel-2-Based Urban Local Climate Zone Classification

Abstract: ABSTRACT:As any supervised classification procedure, also Local Climate Zone (LCZ) mapping requires reliable reference data. These are usually created manually and inevitably include label noise, caused by the complexity of the LCZ class scheme as well as variations in cultural and physical environmental factors. This study aims at evaluating the impact of the training set configuration, i.e. training sample number and imbalance, on the performance of Canonical Correlation Forests (CCFs) for a classification o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, where both the majority voting-based result with multiseasonal Sentinel-2 images (left) and the average of the four singleseason results (right) are shown. The achieved classification accuracy is comparable to our previous work, where the same cross validation has been carried out with single-seasonal Sentinel-2 images and additional features (Global Urban Footprint and Open Street Map) (Qiu et al, 2018), using Canonical Correlation Forests as the classifier. Using the majority voting-based result, an exemplary LCZ map over the city of Munich, Germany, is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Classification Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, where both the majority voting-based result with multiseasonal Sentinel-2 images (left) and the average of the four singleseason results (right) are shown. The achieved classification accuracy is comparable to our previous work, where the same cross validation has been carried out with single-seasonal Sentinel-2 images and additional features (Global Urban Footprint and Open Street Map) (Qiu et al, 2018), using Canonical Correlation Forests as the classifier. Using the majority voting-based result, an exemplary LCZ map over the city of Munich, Germany, is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Classification Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Furthermore, it has to be highlighted that this multi-seasonal result relies only on Sentinel-2 data, and only on four independent, multi-seasonal predictions, which are fused in a simple decision fusion manner based on majority voting. This is in contrast to the more complex set-up that has been necessary in our previous work (Qiu et al, 2018), for which the majority voting-based fusion of 20 different CCF classifier results and external auxiliary data (the Global Urban Footprint and two Open Street Map layers) were necessary. Especially since these Open Street Map layers are not available globally, this shows the great potential of the multi-seasonal ResNet-based approach presented in this paper for global applicability and generalization.…”
Section: Benefits Of Multi-seasonal Classificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there are also several small classes lacking the same amount of labeled samples: compact high-rise, compact low-rise, open high-rise, sparsely built, heavy industry, bush (scrub), bare rock or paved, bare soil or sand. It seems that balancing the training samples is necessary for LCZ mapping, as also investigated and shown by our previous work with a Canonical Correlation Forest (CCF) as the classifier [37]. Using the reflectance of Sentinel-2 over the same study area, Figure 9 illustrates the effect of different balancing methods for each LCZ.…”
Section: Datasets and Feature Choice For Lcz Classificationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The range of the majority filter in the WUDAPT method was a 3 × 3 square window size, and the nonnegative constant λ in CRF was set as 0.5. It is well known that the configurations of the training set and testing set play important roles in the assessment of the LCZ classification [28,45,59]. Since the ground truth data was usually limited, 10 labeled samples were randomly selected in each class for simulating the insufficiency of labeled samples and the remaining samples were used as a testing set, which is widely used in many semi-supervised researches [60,61].…”
Section: Experimental Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%