2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4794599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the surrounding fluid on the compaction of granular materials by tapping: Slow dynamics made slower?

Abstract: We investigate compaction due to tapping in two-dimensional granular columns computationally with the discrete element method (DEM) in two dimensions. We compare the compaction in dry granulates with the compaction of the system immersed in a viscous fluid. We use polygons as particle shapes, so that the resulting pore-space can be triangulated for a finite element method (FEM) for an incompressible fluid. We investigate the competition between a slowing-down of the dynamics due to the viscous forces of the fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the fluid front moves too fast, so that such a center point ends out of the fluid domain of the previous timestep, interpolation is not possible: The timestep must therefore be chosen to avoid that the middle points move too far. We have not quantified the restriction on the timestep, as it is due to the physical time scales: When we simulate the shock propagation in an aggregate of particles in fluid [14], the timestep is related to the speed of the shock propagation (which is of the order of percent of the continuum sound velocity): For harder materials (higher Young's modulus), or "stronger" Figure 3. Free surface modeling: moving the surface of the fluid using the obtained velocities from the finite element method.…”
Section: Surface Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the fluid front moves too fast, so that such a center point ends out of the fluid domain of the previous timestep, interpolation is not possible: The timestep must therefore be chosen to avoid that the middle points move too far. We have not quantified the restriction on the timestep, as it is due to the physical time scales: When we simulate the shock propagation in an aggregate of particles in fluid [14], the timestep is related to the speed of the shock propagation (which is of the order of percent of the continuum sound velocity): For harder materials (higher Young's modulus), or "stronger" Figure 3. Free surface modeling: moving the surface of the fluid using the obtained velocities from the finite element method.…”
Section: Surface Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%