2006
DOI: 10.1134/s1061933x06030021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the surface modification of polymer membranes on their microbiological fouling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to enhance the membrane resistance to biofouling MF PES and PVDF membranes were photochemically modified with a thin layer of a number of hydrophilic polymers: neutral poly(HEMA), negatively charged poly(AMPS), and positively charged and bactericidal poly(qDMAEM) [88]. Higher grafting values were obtained for HEMA compared with qDMAEM and AMPS monomers.…”
Section: Membrane Modification By Uv-graft Polymerization With a Photmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In an attempt to enhance the membrane resistance to biofouling MF PES and PVDF membranes were photochemically modified with a thin layer of a number of hydrophilic polymers: neutral poly(HEMA), negatively charged poly(AMPS), and positively charged and bactericidal poly(qDMAEM) [88]. Higher grafting values were obtained for HEMA compared with qDMAEM and AMPS monomers.…”
Section: Membrane Modification By Uv-graft Polymerization With a Photmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Degree of modification of the composite membranes is 500 ± 20 μg/cm 2 . The concentration of suspension is 1.58 × 10 4 CFU/cm 3 , operating pressure is 0.5 bars and filtration time is 1 h [88]. ⁎ J c1 and J c2 are the membrane fluxes at the beginning and at the end of filtration cycle, respectively; ⁎⁎ J 0 and J 1 are the initial water flux and water flux after filtration of the bacterial suspension and washing with distilled water.…”
Section: Plasma Induced Grafting On the Membrane Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the antibacterial property of the QA groups grafted onto the membrane surface. The bacteria were killed by a contact killing mechanism [35][36][37][38] when the bacteria were adsorbed on the membrane surface due to the attractive electrostatic force, because the E. coli has a negative charge and the PES-g-DMAEMAq membrane has a positive charge. From zeta potential measurements, the surface charge of the PES-g-DMAEMAq membrane was +35 mV (data not shown here).…”
Section: Observation Of Bacteria Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These positive charges could provide a bactericidal effect by a contact killing mechanism [20,21,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%