Effect of the Standardization of Diagnostic Tests on the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Fasting Glucose

Abstract

BackgroundWithout standardization of medical laboratory's testing practices, there is an increase in false diagnoses when relying on test results. However, the effect of test standardization is difficult to assess numerically. This study's purpose is to quantify the effect of the standardization level of a laboratory on the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG).MethodsLaboratories were classified into three levels: ‘highly-standardized laboratory,’ ‘basically-standardized laboratory,’ and ‘non-standardized laboratory.’ Based on the results of Korean External Quality Assessment Scheme (KEQAS), the cutoff values for diagnosis of DM and IFG were recalculated, given false positive and false negative rates.ResultsThe prevalence of DM and IFG in the population as a whole was estimated using the 2013 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) database. When the prevalence of DM from KNHANES was 11.88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.59%–13.17%), the proportion with a systematic false error ranged from 10.91% (95% CI, 9.65%–12.17%) to 13.09% (95% CI, 11.74%–14.45%). The prevalence of IFG varied from 13.59% (95% CI, 12.25%–14.91%) to 40.49% (95% CI, 38.54%–42.43%), in contrast to 24.58% (95% CI, 22.85%–26.31%) of the reference value. The prevalence of DM and IFG tended to be over- and under-estimated more as the laboratory standardization level became lower, respectively.ConclusionOur study proved that standardization of clinical laboratory tests is an important factor affecting the prevalence estimation of national disease statistics based on the simulation using KNHANES data.

Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Prevalence of diabetes among patients with tuberculosis in China

“…Moreover, we found that the prevalence computed from hospital-based studies (9.0%) was higher from populationbased studies (6.9%). This might be attributed to the difference between the diagnostic tools and standards used [32]. Also, people who come to hospital with a health condition might already have some major risk factors associated with developing DM.…”

The Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes Among Armed Forces Personnel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…There are several other studies that indicated the prevalence of diabetes is increasing, passing the time [40,41]. These are not only related to the increasing trend of physical inactivity and consumption of unhealthy diet but also progression in diagnostic techniques as well as effective strategies for detection and follow-up people with dysglycemia [42].…”