2016
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2016-151
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the silica content of diatom prey on the production, decomposition and sinking of fecal pellets of the copepod <i>Calanus sinicus</i>

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The effects of changing the amount of silica in the cell wall of diatom prey, on the production, decomposition rate and sinking velocity of fecal pellets of the calanoid copepod, <i>Calanus sinicus</i>, were examined. Using different light intensities to control the growth of the diatom <i>Thalassiosira weissflogii</i> also led to the accumulation of different amounts of biogenic sili… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under experimental conditions, they dominated under low pH values (Müller, 1980). They are very abundant in aquatic systems and important in the diets of other trophic levels, such as zooplankton (Liu and Wu, 2016) and tadpoles (Souza-Filho et al, 2007;Santos et al, 2016). Tadpoles can also be opportunistic and exploit nutritious food items that become available to them at different periods or habitats (Petranka and Kennedy, 1999;Schiesari et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under experimental conditions, they dominated under low pH values (Müller, 1980). They are very abundant in aquatic systems and important in the diets of other trophic levels, such as zooplankton (Liu and Wu, 2016) and tadpoles (Souza-Filho et al, 2007;Santos et al, 2016). Tadpoles can also be opportunistic and exploit nutritious food items that become available to them at different periods or habitats (Petranka and Kennedy, 1999;Schiesari et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%