2018
DOI: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/revmexingquim/2019v18n3/delaconcha
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Rotating Reference Frame Size for Simulating a Mixing Straight-Blade Impeller in a Baffled Stirred Tank.

Abstract: Modelado de la biodegradación en biorreactores de lodos de hidrocarburos totales del petróleo intemperizados en suelos y sedimentos (Biodegradation modeling of sludge bioreactors of total petroleum hydrocarbons weathering in soil and sediments)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Deviations in the flow field prediction dependent on the rotating reference frame size have been reported in several studies [22,40,41], leading to the general conclusion to enlarge the dimension of the rotating part toward a region where the flow variables' gradient is low to reduce numerical errors due to interpolation inaccuracies in transferring the results between both domains. Some authors suggest locating the interface between the rotating and stationary frame 0.5 impeller radius from the impeller tip, whereas others recommend a ratio of 1.5 [21,40]. For this study, a D-ratio between 1.5 and 2.0 is considered appropriate, as higher RRF diameters would place the interface of the RRF too close to the baffles, where too-high velocity gradients exist.…”
Section: Steady State Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations in the flow field prediction dependent on the rotating reference frame size have been reported in several studies [22,40,41], leading to the general conclusion to enlarge the dimension of the rotating part toward a region where the flow variables' gradient is low to reduce numerical errors due to interpolation inaccuracies in transferring the results between both domains. Some authors suggest locating the interface between the rotating and stationary frame 0.5 impeller radius from the impeller tip, whereas others recommend a ratio of 1.5 [21,40]. For this study, a D-ratio between 1.5 and 2.0 is considered appropriate, as higher RRF diameters would place the interface of the RRF too close to the baffles, where too-high velocity gradients exist.…”
Section: Steady State Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependency of turbulent models on numerical consideration for agitated vessels with impeller has been faced only in a very limited number of research studies. Due to technical limitations in the past, mixers were usually solved with low grid resolutions [145,271,272]. The recent availability of very powerful clusters and multi-core workstations allows the conduction of systematic research studies on the evaluation of the numerical error with respect to the models' assumptions and approximations.…”
Section: Cfd Models Any Turbulence In Rotary Mixersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers set the zones interface at the axial location about 0.5 radius above and below impeller, while the radial distance was set at 1.5 impeller radius [67]. In [272], the authors evaluated four various cylindrical zones around the impeller by varying axial (in the range 0.62 R up to 1.27 R) and radial (in the range 1.11 R up to 1.43 R) distance from the impeller. The researchers conclude that in order to perform reliable CFD simulation, the rotating zone has to include the locations where the flow motion shifts from accelerating to decelerating.…”
Section: Impeller Rotation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A pesar de la alta precisión de los métodos no estacionarios su costo computacional es muy elevado, una alternativa son los métodos estacionarios en los cuales el impulsor se mantiene estático en la simulación y el campo de velocidades en rotación puede ser aproximado usando los siguientes enfoques (Joshi et al, 2011): condiciones de Frontera de Impulsor (IBC, Impeller Boundary Condition), termino Fuente (SS, Source-Sink approach), o marcos de referencia múltiples (MRF, Multiple Reference Frame). Este último ha sido ampliamente estudiado y aplicado en numerosos trabajos, (Jaworski and Dudczak, 1998;Bujalski et al, 2002;Ramírez-Gómez et al, 2015;De La Concha-Gómez et al, 2019) mostrando que es capaz de proporcionar resultados comparables a los obtenidos en enfoques como el SM pero con un tiempo de cómputo de un orden de magnitud menor (Oshinowo et al, 1999), con la limitante de que la interacción con los bafles o demás piezas estáticas sea baja (Oshinowo et al, 2000).…”
Section: Modelo De Múltiples Marcos De Referencia (Mrf)unclassified