2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the relative degree of foulant “hydrophobicity” on membrane fouling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A greater fouling potential of the hydrophilic organic fractions was admitted by Johir et al [112], Qin et al [113], Shen et al [114] and Pramanik et al [115]. Mu et al [116] used multivariate statistics to study the relationships between RH, the other physicochemical properties of the mixed liquor constituents and the fouling rate in MBR with PVDF modules. The analysed substances were classified as hydrophobic/hydrophilic based on the critical retention factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater fouling potential of the hydrophilic organic fractions was admitted by Johir et al [112], Qin et al [113], Shen et al [114] and Pramanik et al [115]. Mu et al [116] used multivariate statistics to study the relationships between RH, the other physicochemical properties of the mixed liquor constituents and the fouling rate in MBR with PVDF modules. The analysed substances were classified as hydrophobic/hydrophilic based on the critical retention factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…solution processing [48,[102][103][104][105]. Using a microfluidic approach, Bacchin et al showed how a small change in surface properties of a poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has drastic consequences on pore blocking and particle adsorption [59].…”
Section: Membrane Adsorption and Pore Blockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a hydrophobic surface in water disturbs the preexisting network of hydrogen bonds of water molecules, increasing the free energy of the system; as a consequence, hydrophobic surfaces will be naturally pushed together so as to reduce the water-contacting interfacial area [ 101 ]. Membrane and foulant hydrophobicity is notoriously known to be one of the main contributors to fouling especially in protein solution processing [ 48 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 ]. Using a microfluidic approach, Bacchin et al showed how a small change in surface properties of a poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has drastic consequences on pore blocking and particle adsorption [ 59 ].…”
Section: Fouling: Stages and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have shown that a membrane surface with higher hydrophobicity would suffer more serious adsorptive fouling (Jin et al, 2001;Weis et al, 2005;Maximous et al, 2009;Xiao et al, 2014b;Zhao et al, 2018). Higher hydrophobicity of the foulant would make the hydrophobic adsorption stronger (Xiao et al, 2014b;Mu et al, 2019). The air-water-solid three-phase contact angle (θ ) is usually used to judge the relative hydrophobicity of the membrane surface or foulant particle surface, and a smaller contact angle suggests a weaker hydrophobicity (or stronger hydrophilicity) (van Oss, 2006;Israelachvili, 2015;Jiang and Patel, 2019).…”
Section: Hydrophobic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%