Organ Regeneration 1974
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8456-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Quantity of Tissue Removed on Regeneration of Organs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, differences in growth plate regenerative capacity along the length of the hindlimb may indicate differences in the magnitude of the regeneration stimulus, noting that femoral amputations remove a considerably a greater mass and volume of the limb, and expose a greater wound surface, than amputations that divide the tibiofibula. In the former regard it has been shown in studies of regrowth of mammalian viscera that, following incomplete extirpation, the magnitude of the regenerative response is proportional to the quantity of tissue removed (25). In comparing femoral with tibiofibular amputations in the context of this perspective, we estimate that the former removes about twice the volume of limb tissue ablated by the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Alternatively, differences in growth plate regenerative capacity along the length of the hindlimb may indicate differences in the magnitude of the regeneration stimulus, noting that femoral amputations remove a considerably a greater mass and volume of the limb, and expose a greater wound surface, than amputations that divide the tibiofibula. In the former regard it has been shown in studies of regrowth of mammalian viscera that, following incomplete extirpation, the magnitude of the regenerative response is proportional to the quantity of tissue removed (25). In comparing femoral with tibiofibular amputations in the context of this perspective, we estimate that the former removes about twice the volume of limb tissue ablated by the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%