2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the presence of the antimicrobial tylosin in swine waste on anaerobic treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methylation of the 23S rRNA at position A2058 interferes with hybridization with the probe, allowing for quantification of unmethylated strains. This indirect detection of methylation was required because the 5-nitro-indole-substituted probe used in previous work (5,18) for direct detection of methylated rRNA did not have a sufficient signal in FISH experiments. All results from the MLS B probe were normalized to hybridization results with Bact0338 to limit the number of false positives resulting from poorly fixed or otherwise unresponsive cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methylation of the 23S rRNA at position A2058 interferes with hybridization with the probe, allowing for quantification of unmethylated strains. This indirect detection of methylation was required because the 5-nitro-indole-substituted probe used in previous work (5,18) for direct detection of methylated rRNA did not have a sufficient signal in FISH experiments. All results from the MLS B probe were normalized to hybridization results with Bact0338 to limit the number of false positives resulting from poorly fixed or otherwise unresponsive cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) It is relevant to swine production environments in the United States because all three classes of MLS B antimicrobials are used there. A variety of methods have been used to quantify macrolide resistance, including traditional culture-based methods (for an example, see reference 9), PCR (for examples, see references 27 and 32), or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (for an example, see reference 34) detection of specific point mutations known to result in resis-tance in the targeted microorganisms, using PCR to detect erm and mef (efflux) genes (for examples, see references 6 and 31) and using membrane hybridizations to detect the degree of methylation at A2058 (5,18). In our previous study of swine production, a discrepancy was observed between culture-based measurements of resistance to the macrolide tylosin and membrane hybridizations quantifying the ribosomal methylation leading to MLS B resistance (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a slight decrease in the prevalence of cells that hybridized to the bacterial probe but not the MLS B probe (presumed MLS B resistant bacteria) occurred after tylosin addition, from 56.2 ± 3.9% in the absence of tylosin to 38.5 ± 3.2% and 39.3 ± 5.9% under low and high tylosin dosing, respectively ( Figure 6). Angenent et al (2008) reported an increase in MLS B resistance in an ASBR treating swine waste but attributed their results to the enrichment with resistant bacteria present in the reactor feed. Occurrence of macrolide resistant organisms in swine waste has been reported previously (Chen et al, 2010;Holzel et al, 2010;Jindal et al, 2006).…”
Section: Mls B Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the MLS B antimicrobials are chemically distinct, methylation or mutation of a single base of the 23S rRNA prevents binding and results in cross-resistance to all three classes (29). The prevalence of MLS B antimicrobial resistance in the microbial community can therefore be quantified indirectly by hybridization of an oligonucleotide probe to unmethylated, MLS B -sensitive ribosomes, using either membrane hybridization (1,10) or FISH (31). These methods do not require culturing or a comprehensive knowledge of the diversity of resistance gene sequences, but they do not detect resistance to specific antimicrobials that results from other mechanisms, such as macrolide efflux.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%