1986
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/28/6/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the magnetic field on the collision frequencies for fusion reactions at low energies

Abstract: The results of a theoretical study of the effect of a magne;ic field. B. on the coliision frequencies.F,. for fusion reactions at comparaiively low energies are presented. i n a usual magnetic field strength. both the cross-section for fusion reactions and the cross-section for the coulomb scattering betueen the ion-ion coilisions are unaffected by B. However. due to both the gyration of the particle and the coulomb scatterings occurring during a free path for fusion reactions. the relative \elocit> between co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the magnetic field for the collision frequency of helium atoms is given by the value of the product of the mean collision time between helium ions and protons τ αH and gyration frequency of helium ions ω α (Mestel 2003, p. 18 therein;Braginskij 1963;Imazu 1986). The mean collision time τ αH is given by…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the magnetic field for the collision frequency of helium atoms is given by the value of the product of the mean collision time between helium ions and protons τ αH and gyration frequency of helium ions ω α (Mestel 2003, p. 18 therein;Braginskij 1963;Imazu 1986). The mean collision time τ αH is given by…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was claimed that relatively weak magnetic fields reduce collision rates of nuclear reactions by a factor of two through alignments of directions in which charged nuclei can move [87,88]. The claim is, however, wrong [89,90] since it was based on a completelymistaken treatment of 2D space perpendicular to the field direction, and cases of B = 0 and B = 0 are not treated consistently.…”
Section: Appendix B: Effect On Nuclear Reaction Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%