2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4922247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the interface resistance in non-local Hanle measurements

Abstract: We use lateral spin valves with varying interface resistance to measure non-local Hanle effect in order to extract the spin-diffusion length of the non-magnetic channel. A general expression that describes spin injection and transport, taking into account the influence of the interface resistance, is used to fit our results. Whereas the fitted spin-diffusion length value is in agreement with the one obtained from standard non-local measurements in the case of a finite interface resistance, in the case of trans… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(c) and (d)). These Hanle data were fitted with an analytical expression obtained by solving the Bloch equation considering spin precession, diffusion and relaxation for transparent contacts [13,21] and taking into account the out-of-plane rotation of the Py magnetization [3]. From the fitting, we obtained λ Al to be 688 nm at 4.2 K and 544 nm at 80 K, which are comparable to the values obtained from the spin-valve measurements ( Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2(c) and (d)). These Hanle data were fitted with an analytical expression obtained by solving the Bloch equation considering spin precession, diffusion and relaxation for transparent contacts [13,21] and taking into account the out-of-plane rotation of the Py magnetization [3]. From the fitting, we obtained λ Al to be 688 nm at 4.2 K and 544 nm at 80 K, which are comparable to the values obtained from the spin-valve measurements ( Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The electrical resistivities of the Al and Py wires were measured to be 7.6 × 10 −8 Ω.m (1.15 × 10 −7 Ω.m) and 3.35 × 10 −7 Ω.m (4.76 × 10 −7 Ω.m) at 4.2 K (300 K), respectively. The contact resistances of the Py/Al junctions were accurately measured by the 4-probe method where the current was sourced between one end of the Al channel and one end of the ferromagnet wire, while the voltage was measured between the other end of the Al channel and the other end of the same ferromagnet wire, and found to be less than 10 −15 Ω.m 2 , thus confirming their transparent nature [13].…”
Section: Device Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations