2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the impact energy of various peening techniques on the induced plastic deformation region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is estimated that the surface of the material was hardened due to solid particle erodents. As similar to Kanou et al at 90° impingement angle, solid particle erodents hit the surface and make the surface more hardened. By this way, the flexural modulus values of eroded PPS composites at 90° impingement angle were improved according to uneroded composite samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It is estimated that the surface of the material was hardened due to solid particle erodents. As similar to Kanou et al at 90° impingement angle, solid particle erodents hit the surface and make the surface more hardened. By this way, the flexural modulus values of eroded PPS composites at 90° impingement angle were improved according to uneroded composite samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The first one occurs at relatively low initial abrasive particle velocity. 23 And the other three are substantiated in Figure 4 where the case of a = 10°s erves as a representative. As shown in Figure 4(a), the abrasive particle rebounds after it impacts the target plate, while an apparent pit is left on the impacted surface.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Cavitation peening introduces high compressive residual stress since cavitation bubbles collapsing produce very high impact of the order of gigapascals and beyond, which are more severe than the impact produced by collisions between shot and the surface. Also, the strain velocity when the impact due to bubble collapsing deforms the surface is much higher than that produced by the impact of shot [22]. This difference gives rise to the differences in compressive residual stress and, as a result, the longer fatigue life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%