2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11041-014-9668-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Grain Size and Deformation Substructure of Austenite on the Crystal Geometry of Bainite and Martensite in Low-Carbon Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with other previous research results, [12,17,18] although in that research, the changes of grain refinement were observed from optical micrographs. However, the result of this research differs from previous studies, [14][15][16] which indicate that a coarser transformed microstructure forms after austenite deformation. There may be two different reasons for this.…”
Section: Controversial Effect Of Austenite Deformation On Effectivcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with other previous research results, [12,17,18] although in that research, the changes of grain refinement were observed from optical micrographs. However, the result of this research differs from previous studies, [14][15][16] which indicate that a coarser transformed microstructure forms after austenite deformation. There may be two different reasons for this.…”
Section: Controversial Effect Of Austenite Deformation On Effectivcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous investigations, [12,17,18] AF microstructure is the main phase constituent after relatively slow continuous cooling, 30 [12] and 10 K/ s, [17,18] or isothermal holding at high temperatures, 773 K to 873 K (500°C to 600°C), [12] while in others, [14][15][16] with relatively high cooling rates, 50 K/ s, [14] and low transformation temperatures, 623 K [15] and 673 K (350°C and 400°C), [16] BF still dominates the transformed microstructure after austenite deformation.…”
Section: Controversial Effect Of Austenite Deformation On Effectivmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, increasing austenite deformation [4,9,12,13] has been shown to increase the AF fraction, while 'AF-like' microstructures are produced when continuously cooled without austenite deformation [14][15][16][17]. These observations are contradicted from research [18][19][20] which indicates that even after significant amounts of austenite deformation, the transformation product still consists of parallel BF laths and the typical AF microstructure is absent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many investigations concerning the effect of processing parameters on the effective grain sizes of steel microstructures [6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, some of the results are still controversial, especially for the influence of austenite deformation below the austenite nil-recrystallisation temperature (Tnr).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%