2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Flow Rule on the Bearing Capacity of Strip Foundations on Sand by the Upper-Bound Limit Analysis and Slip Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is used for the sake of simplicity so as to exclusively examine the effect of surcharge loading on the limit state lateral earth pressure of geosynthetic-reinforced retaining structures. The assumption of the associated flow rule has also been effectively adopted in a majority of the previous FELA studies throughout the literature for the stability analysis of various geo-structures (Steedman and Zeng 1990;Lancellotta 2007;Bellezza et al 2012;Veiskarami et al 2017;Khatri 2019;Fathipour et al 2020Fathipour et al , 2021a; however, it is worth noting that increasing the dilation angle leads to the slight decrease in the values of active lateral earth pressures for the observed trends in this study (Veiskarami et al 2014;. Incorporation of the non-associated flow rule in the finite element limit analysis has not been systematically established in the literature so far.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is used for the sake of simplicity so as to exclusively examine the effect of surcharge loading on the limit state lateral earth pressure of geosynthetic-reinforced retaining structures. The assumption of the associated flow rule has also been effectively adopted in a majority of the previous FELA studies throughout the literature for the stability analysis of various geo-structures (Steedman and Zeng 1990;Lancellotta 2007;Bellezza et al 2012;Veiskarami et al 2017;Khatri 2019;Fathipour et al 2020Fathipour et al , 2021a; however, it is worth noting that increasing the dilation angle leads to the slight decrease in the values of active lateral earth pressures for the observed trends in this study (Veiskarami et al 2014;. Incorporation of the non-associated flow rule in the finite element limit analysis has not been systematically established in the literature so far.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the abovementioned discussion, FELA have been commonly performed throughout the literature using the failure criterion following the associated flow rule. 20,21,38,43,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]59 In particular, there exists no specific and efficient approach in the literature to account for the non-associated flow rule in the lower bound formulations. The non-associated flow rule should be implemented in the induced plastic strains; while the lower bound theorem does not take the induced strains into account and deals mainly with the stresses mobilized in the soil medium.…”
Section: Felamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fathipour et al [8] studied the active and passive earth pressures on the retaining structures having an unsaturated backfill. Other authors who studied the behaviour of associative and non-associative material and their effect on the behaviour of common geotechnical structures; i.e., Davis [9], Chen [10], Michalowski and Mróz [11], Drescher and Detournay [12], and Veiskarami et al [13]. However, in 2007, Michalowski [14] proposed a new formulation based on upper bound theorem of limit analysis to calculate the permanent displacements of slopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%