2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61686-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the first federally funded US antismoking national media campaign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
214
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
18
214
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also provides further support for previous research showing that hard-hitting, general population antismoking media campaigns can be used to promote quit attempts across a variety of demographic subpopulations (McAfee et al, 2013(McAfee et al, , 2015Nonnemaker et al, 2014). Specifically, we found patterns in PE varied by race/ethnicity and mental health status, indicating that vulnerable populations report higher PE scores.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This study also provides further support for previous research showing that hard-hitting, general population antismoking media campaigns can be used to promote quit attempts across a variety of demographic subpopulations (McAfee et al, 2013(McAfee et al, , 2015Nonnemaker et al, 2014). Specifically, we found patterns in PE varied by race/ethnicity and mental health status, indicating that vulnerable populations report higher PE scores.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Specifically, we found patterns in PE varied by race/ethnicity and mental health status, indicating that vulnerable populations report higher PE scores. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic smokers in this study responded more favorably to Tips ads compared with white smokers, which may help explain previous findings showing that Tips advertisements had a larger effect on increased quit attempts among nonHispanic black smokers than white smokers (McAfee et al, 2013(McAfee et al, , 2015. Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, 95% confidence intervals in brackets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations