1985
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90307-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the calcium antagonist diltiazem on atrioventricular conduction in chronic atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36][37][38][39] These beneficial effects of diltiazem are manifest at doses that produce little change in AV conduction during sinus rhythm and at mean plasma concentrations ranging from 126 to 234 ng/m126'37-39 in the same range as produced by the high dose in the present study. Previous work in dogs suggests that the rate-dependent actions of diltiazem on AV node refractoriness are responsible for its efficacy in experimental models of atrial fibrillation30 and AV reentrant tachycardia.31 The current study shows that the ability of diltiazem to increase AV nodal refractoriness in humans exhibits rate dependency (Figures 3 and 4) measured at both fast and slow cycle lengths ( Figure 7).…”
Section: Potential Significance Of Rate-dependent Actions Of Diltiazesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[36][37][38][39] These beneficial effects of diltiazem are manifest at doses that produce little change in AV conduction during sinus rhythm and at mean plasma concentrations ranging from 126 to 234 ng/m126'37-39 in the same range as produced by the high dose in the present study. Previous work in dogs suggests that the rate-dependent actions of diltiazem on AV node refractoriness are responsible for its efficacy in experimental models of atrial fibrillation30 and AV reentrant tachycardia.31 The current study shows that the ability of diltiazem to increase AV nodal refractoriness in humans exhibits rate dependency (Figures 3 and 4) measured at both fast and slow cycle lengths ( Figure 7).…”
Section: Potential Significance Of Rate-dependent Actions Of Diltiazesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, the structure of RR interval histograms recorded in our experiments were unimodal and skewed to the right as previously reported in spontaneous atrial fibrillation in humans. 14,32,34,36,38 In addition, the characteristics of atrial fibrillation during continuous stimulation were similar to those of atrial fibrillation that persisted after pacing in those experiments in which the arrhythmia persisted long enough to allow analysis. Furthermore, the changes in RR interval histograms that we observed after the administration of diltiazem were very similar to those reported after oral therapy in humans.14,47…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These results suggest that S-2150 is a favorable hypotensive agent for hypertensive patients with ischemic heart disease [312]. Diltiazem / once 120 mg or 3x80 mg daily per os lowered VR in patients with AF [296] Diltiazem / 4x60 mg per os reduced the maximal and submaximal HRs during exercise [297] Diltiazem / bolus of either 150 or 300 µg/kg over 2 minutes intravenously converted VT to SR, reduced HR to 100 beats/min [302] Diltiazem / continuous infusion of for 24 h (minimum dose, 0.l reduced the incidence of AF after coronary bypass grafting [305] mg/kg/h) Diltiazem / 0.2 mg/kg intravenously for 3 minutes terminated programmed electrical stimulation induced SVT at high right atrium [310] Clentiazem (TA-3090) / 0.1 mg/kg intravenously for 3 minutes terminated programmed electrical stimulation induced SVT at high right atrium [310] Clentiazem / 80 and 120 mg/day antianginal action in patients with stable angina [311] Clentiazem / 80 and 120 mg/day induced first-degree AV block as a sideeffect in patients with stable angina [311] 9.3. Other CCAs Semotiadil (SD-3211) Animal studies with semotiadil…”
Section: S-2150mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, in a study involving 180 patients with rapid AF, low-dose diltiazem (≤ 0.2 mg/kg as a starting intravenous bolus) proved to be as effective as the standard dose of 0.25 mg/kg (according to the 2006 guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology for the management of patients with AF) in adequate rate control but the complication of hypotension was seen significantly less frequently 18 vs. 35 % in low and standard doses, respectively [295]. Oral diltiazem treatment also effectively lowered VR in patients with AF [296] and also reduced the maximal and submaximal HRs during exercise without affecting oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio or BP [297]. The effects of diltiazem on exercise tolerance are controversial in chronic AF as one study found a modest improvement similarly to that observed with verapamil [229] while another found no benefit in terms of improving either exercise tolerance or CO with either diltiazem or verapamil [228].…”
Section: Anipamil Animal Studies With Anipamilmentioning
confidence: 99%