2009
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/7/074003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the back surface topography on the efficiency in silicon solar cells

Abstract: Different processes are used on the back surface of silicon wafers to form cells falling into three groups: textured, planar, and sawed-off pyramid back surface. The characteristic parameters of the cells, I SC , V OC , FF, Pm, and E ff , are measured. All these parameters of the planar back surface cells are the best. The FF, Pm, and E ff of sawed-off pyramid back surface cells are superior to textured back surface cells, although I SC and V OC are lower. The parasitic resistance is analyzed to explain the hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7] The metallic back-reflector of a solar cell can also be textured at transverse length scales greatly larger than a thousand nanometers, but planar backing appears to perform better. 8 In contrast, periodic texturing of the metallic back-reflector was indicated even in the early 1980s to help absorb light better, if the period were a few hundred nanometers. 9 Hence, the use of a metallic surface-relief grating as the back-reflector may result in higher efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] The metallic back-reflector of a solar cell can also be textured at transverse length scales greatly larger than a thousand nanometers, but planar backing appears to perform better. 8 In contrast, periodic texturing of the metallic back-reflector was indicated even in the early 1980s to help absorb light better, if the period were a few hundred nanometers. 9 Hence, the use of a metallic surface-relief grating as the back-reflector may result in higher efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photogeneration in absorber layer can be increased using this BSF layer. A BSF layer can be deposited in back surface of solar cell using screen printed technology which is also an effective method to improve the efficiency of solar cell [22]. The simulation result shows that photogenerated current increases when a BSF layer deposited on rear side of the solar cell.…”
Section: Thickness Variation Of Back Surface Field (Bsf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface between c-Si and rear contact behave like a pn junction and an electric field forms at the interface which introduces a barrier to minority carrier flow to the rear surface. Thus a higher level of minority carrier concentration is maintained in bulk of the solar cell [22]. Al material has been chosen as the back contact of MJ solar cell for its some unique advantages over others high conductivity materials.…”
Section: Thickness Variation Of Back Surface Field (Bsf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metallic back reflector of a solar cell can also be textured at transverse length scales greatly larger than a thousand nanometers, but planar backing appears to perform better [109]. In contrast, periodic texturing of the metallic back reflector was indicated in the early 1980s to help trap light better, if the period were a few hundred nanometers [110].…”
Section: Light-management Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%