2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.09.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the anisotropic growth on the fracture toughness measurements obtained in the Fe2B layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The layer does not have a uniform thickness, as illustrated in Figure 1 in this paper. Moreover, the sawtooth-like morphology of the boride layers can be observed in Figure 1 of reference [11], Figure 2 of reference [12], and Figure 8 of reference [1]. All of that Figures illustrate a classical sawtooth-like morphology, with its non-uniform layer thickness that is dependent on the treatment duration.…”
Section: Boride Layer Formation On Carbon Steelmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The layer does not have a uniform thickness, as illustrated in Figure 1 in this paper. Moreover, the sawtooth-like morphology of the boride layers can be observed in Figure 1 of reference [11], Figure 2 of reference [12], and Figure 8 of reference [1]. All of that Figures illustrate a classical sawtooth-like morphology, with its non-uniform layer thickness that is dependent on the treatment duration.…”
Section: Boride Layer Formation On Carbon Steelmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Coatings 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 21 [11], Figure 2 of reference [12], and Figure 8 of reference [1]. All of that Figures illustrate a classical sawtooth-like morphology, with its non-uniform layer thickness that is dependent on the treatment duration.…”
Section: Mathematical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Second, the saw-tooth interface morphology is reduced due to Cr and Ni elements compared of low carbon steels, causing the adherence between the phases to decrease. Third, the magnitude of the tensile residual stresses promotes crack growth coupled with the low fracture toughness of the FeB phase whose value fell within the range of 1.48-3.02 MPa m [26] causing the early onset of cohesive damage. The mechanisms of damage and determined critical loads are particular cases of each layer/substrate system.…”
Section: Scratch Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Thus, more microcracks may be produced vertical to the [002] orientation under a deformation process. 26,30 Many investigations were carried out to investigate the large inherent brittleness perpendicular to the [002] orientation and sensibility of microcracking because of the weaker B-B covalent bond and bounding energy as well as the interaction of iron and boron atoms, which also results from the spatial heterogeneous distribution of Fe and B atoms in Fe 2 B lattice. 26,27,31,32 Therefore, bulk Fe 2 B intermetallic with various orientations displays strongly anisotropy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%