2017
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1598
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Addition of Cetuximab to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Radiation Therapy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer

Abstract: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00655876.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
135
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
135
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The major acute adverse events in this study were myelosuppression and esophagitis, most of which were grades 1‐2. Grade 3 esophagitis occurred in 9.0% patients, similar with previous reports with radiotherapy of 50 Gy . A total of 2.3% of patients had grade 3 late esophageal strictures, which was 4‐5% in SIB studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The major acute adverse events in this study were myelosuppression and esophagitis, most of which were grades 1‐2. Grade 3 esophagitis occurred in 9.0% patients, similar with previous reports with radiotherapy of 50 Gy . A total of 2.3% of patients had grade 3 late esophageal strictures, which was 4‐5% in SIB studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The addition of cetuximab to concurrent CRT did not improve OS. These phase III trial results highlighted the need for predictive biomarkers in the treatment of EC (Table ) …”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C225 in combination with EGFR not only blocked the secretion of TGF-and signal transduction but also decreased the expression of EGFR on the cell membrane surface (Liao and Carpenter, 2009). Clinically, C225 combined with radiotherapy showed a significant effect on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and C225 combined with radiotherapy as a routine treatment on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma has been accepted by the majority of doctors (Sok et al, 2006;Pozzi et al, 2016;Suntharalingam et al, 2017 ;Weidhaas et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%