2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of tensile loading rate on interfacial properties of SMA/polymer composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to induce a similar stress state in all SMA wire configurations and to ensure the comparability of the results, the mechanically induced pull-out test was performed, which corresponds to the state of the art. ,,, In the case of the thermally activated pull-out test, the stress distribution at the interface has not yet been understood as the transformation behavior, and thus the contraction of the SMA wire, is not homogeneous. , …”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to induce a similar stress state in all SMA wire configurations and to ensure the comparability of the results, the mechanically induced pull-out test was performed, which corresponds to the state of the art. ,,, In the case of the thermally activated pull-out test, the stress distribution at the interface has not yet been understood as the transformation behavior, and thus the contraction of the SMA wire, is not homogeneous. , …”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found from Figure 4b that the predicted tensile strength are slightly higher than the experimental values at high temperatures compared with Figure 4a. This is due to the fact that the material is more susceptible to the crack growth at high loading rates, resulting in degradation of interfacial properties 57,58 . The present model does not account for the strain rate effect directly, and thus leads to the higher predicted results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is due to the fact that the material is more susceptible to the crack growth at high loading rates, resulting in degradation of interfacial properties. 57,58 The present model does not account for the strain rate effect directly, and thus leads to the higher predicted results. In general, the comparison results show that when the tensile strength decreases by 90% with increasing temperature, our model can still accurately predict the tensile strengths at high temperatures.…”
Section: Peek Based Smp Prepared By Zhuang Jingdong Huazhong Universi...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[5][6][7] The most widely adopted test is a mechanically induced pull-out test with an external force pulling out the embedded SMA wire. [8][9][10][11] However, in this test, the influence of temperature during activation of the SMA wire and the resulting nonlinear stress-strain characteristics during phase transformation of the SMA wire are not considered. In contrast, in an in situ thermally induced pull-out test, the SMA wire generates the pull-out force itself upon heating above its phase transition temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%