2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of temperature on sulfonamide antibiotics degradation, and on antibiotic resistance determinants and hosts in animal manures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, sulfonamide removal is more important in swine manure than chicken manure. In addition, sulfonamide transformation could be more pronounced in chicken manure at 30°C rather than 60°C [96]. These results suggested that the microbial community composition, related to the 10 and 20 mg kg -1 dry matter) showed that chortetracycline and sulfamethazine removal depends on the presence of straw but tylosine removal did not [98].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, sulfonamide removal is more important in swine manure than chicken manure. In addition, sulfonamide transformation could be more pronounced in chicken manure at 30°C rather than 60°C [96]. These results suggested that the microbial community composition, related to the 10 and 20 mg kg -1 dry matter) showed that chortetracycline and sulfamethazine removal depends on the presence of straw but tylosine removal did not [98].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Approximately 100 mg of organic fertilizer samples was used to determine their C, H, O, N, and S contents and C/N ratios by means of an elemental analyzer (vario MACRO cube, Elementar, Germany) [28]. The antibiotic residues were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) analysis, and extraction and purification procedures followed the description by Qian et al [29,30] Nine different antibiotics were analyzed: SDZ, SMZ, SMN, OTC, TC, CTC, Dox, Oflox, and Enroflox. In this experiment, according to the parameters of the test instrument, the detection limit was in the range of 0.5-15 µg kg −1 manure (dry weight), and the limit of quantification was in the range of 1.5-50 µg kg −1 manure (dry weight) [29].…”
Section: Analysis Of Physicochemical Properties and Antibiotic Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the TET-resistant subcommunities in the control soil were represented by a few taxa dominated by Dyella , the manure-soil interface harboured a rich TET-resistant bacteriome dominated by Providencia and Enteroccoccus in the case of native soils, and by Providencia and Achromobacter in the case of γ-irradiated soils, already 7 days after addition. These genera have been frequently found in cow and pig manure and may harbour TET-r genes such as tet (W), tet (Q) or tet (M) 3134 . While high levels of TET-r genes persisted in soil over the whole incubation period, the composition of TET-resistant subcommunities partially reverted at the end of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%