2018
DOI: 10.11113/jt.v80.11467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Temperature on Rheology Behaviour of Banana Peel Pectin Extracted Using Hot Compressed Water

Abstract: Banana peel pectin is extracted from banana peel waste using a hot compressed water extraction (140-160°C, 5 minutes, 1.18 mm particle size). Physicochemical contents of banana peel pectin were found to be in a similar range with commercial pectin, and is comprised of moisture (7.44-8.47%), ash (3.45-4.98%), protein (1.08-1.92%), fat (0.04-3.42), carbohydrate (83-86%), total sugar (1.77-3.41%), energy (353-369 kcal/100g) and specific heat (1.42-1.62 kJ/kg°C). These contents possibly related to their flow defor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to notice that the average Cp rev of CMs are lower than those of cutins, Figure 6C. This is very likely due to the contribution of the polysaccharide fraction of the cuticle membrane, as the heat capacities of cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin are reported to be in the 1.2-1.5 J/g • C range at room temperature (Blokhin et al, 2011;Domínguez et al, 2011;Mohd Rasidek et al, 2018;Qi et al, 2020). Considering an average Cp rev = 1.75 J/g • C for cutin and 1.3 J/g • C for polysaccharides and their relative abundances in CMs (64 and 36%, respectively), the calculated Cp rev for cuticle membranes is 1.59 J/g • C. Thus, polysaccharides cause a theoretical reduction of 0.16 J/g • C in the cutin matrix, quite close to the average 0.12 J/g • C experimental difference observed (Figure 6C).…”
Section: Reversible Heat Capacity Of Tomato Fruit Cuticle Membranes and Cutinsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is interesting to notice that the average Cp rev of CMs are lower than those of cutins, Figure 6C. This is very likely due to the contribution of the polysaccharide fraction of the cuticle membrane, as the heat capacities of cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin are reported to be in the 1.2-1.5 J/g • C range at room temperature (Blokhin et al, 2011;Domínguez et al, 2011;Mohd Rasidek et al, 2018;Qi et al, 2020). Considering an average Cp rev = 1.75 J/g • C for cutin and 1.3 J/g • C for polysaccharides and their relative abundances in CMs (64 and 36%, respectively), the calculated Cp rev for cuticle membranes is 1.59 J/g • C. Thus, polysaccharides cause a theoretical reduction of 0.16 J/g • C in the cutin matrix, quite close to the average 0.12 J/g • C experimental difference observed (Figure 6C).…”
Section: Reversible Heat Capacity Of Tomato Fruit Cuticle Membranes and Cutinsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These methods have led to a better gel by increasing the elastic (G') and viscous (G") moduli to 0.170 and 0.018 Pa, respectively. Banana peel pectin is extracted from its waste using hot compressed water (140-160 • C, 5 min, particle size 1.18 mm) [121]. Its moisture (7.44-8.47%), ash (3.45-4.98%), protein (1.08-1.92%), fat (0.04-3.42), starch (83-86%), total sugar (1.77-3.41%), energy (353-369 kcal/100g), and heat (1.42-1.62 kJ/kg • C) are in a close range as industrial pectin.…”
Section: Subcritical Water Extraction (Swe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly used in the food business as a hydrocolloid because it can absorb water and form gels at low concentrations. Additionally, it is fast expanding into other industries, with new uses being found on a regular basis [121]. These applications are connected with structural and functional features of extracted polysaccharides.…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subcritical water extraction is an advanced extraction technique that uses water as extracting solvent at 100°C until 374°C with a pressure higher than atmospheric pressure in the range of 0.1 MPa to 22.1 Mpa to ensure the water at its liquid condition during the extraction process [12][13][14]. Subcritical water extraction also demonstrated shorter extraction time (5-60 minutes) than conventional methods which could take at least 8 hours using the Soxhlet extraction method [15,16]. In comparison to the other non-conventional method, supercritical fluid extraction, it is also required shorter time of experiments, however, it needs selective solvent and operates at the supercritical condition, compared to subcritical water extraction, which only uses water in subcritical condition [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%