2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-003-0190-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of temperature on gastric intramucosal P CO 2 measurement by saline and air tonometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This CO 2 production is probably caused by buffering of bicarbonate with the amino acids of the proteins of the meal (NH 3 ' '/ HCO 3 ( 0/NH 3 OH'/CO 2 ). A dinner as provocation meal demonstrates the greatest disturbance of CO 2 measurements, which can be explained by the fact that dinner is the most ''uncontrolled'' meal, owing to different factors: 1) chewing of the meal which adds bicarbonate to the gastric contents via the saliva [13], 2) relatively large amount of proteins, and 3) differences in temperature after ingestion of this meal [14,15]. Although theoretically a perfect test meal, with minimal in vitro production and absorption of CO 2 , the fat-predominant meal was practically intolerable for most subjects, and is therefore clinically useless.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CO 2 production is probably caused by buffering of bicarbonate with the amino acids of the proteins of the meal (NH 3 ' '/ HCO 3 ( 0/NH 3 OH'/CO 2 ). A dinner as provocation meal demonstrates the greatest disturbance of CO 2 measurements, which can be explained by the fact that dinner is the most ''uncontrolled'' meal, owing to different factors: 1) chewing of the meal which adds bicarbonate to the gastric contents via the saliva [13], 2) relatively large amount of proteins, and 3) differences in temperature after ingestion of this meal [14,15]. Although theoretically a perfect test meal, with minimal in vitro production and absorption of CO 2 , the fat-predominant meal was practically intolerable for most subjects, and is therefore clinically useless.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%