2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, thermophilic condition is used a lot of investigation in cattle manure alone study because of its more efficient to produce biogas at cattle manure digestion (Abubakar and Ismail 2012;Ahring et al 2001;Boe and Angelidaki 2009;ElMashad et al 2004;Mohaibes and Heinonen-Tanski 2012;Omar et al 2008;Sung and Santha 2003). In cattle manure alone digestion studies, HRTs were conducted between 10 and 20 days, while biogas production usually ranged from 0.15 to 0.30 L CH 4 g -1 VS day -1 with COD-VS removal ranged from about 30-55 % (Abbasi et al 2011;Ahring et al 2001;Demirer and Chen 2005;El-Mashad et al 2004;Ghaly 1989;Gungor-Demirci and Demirer 2004;Omar et al 2008;Rico et al 2011;Sung and Santha 2003).…”
Section: Important Parameters For Operating and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, thermophilic condition is used a lot of investigation in cattle manure alone study because of its more efficient to produce biogas at cattle manure digestion (Abubakar and Ismail 2012;Ahring et al 2001;Boe and Angelidaki 2009;ElMashad et al 2004;Mohaibes and Heinonen-Tanski 2012;Omar et al 2008;Sung and Santha 2003). In cattle manure alone digestion studies, HRTs were conducted between 10 and 20 days, while biogas production usually ranged from 0.15 to 0.30 L CH 4 g -1 VS day -1 with COD-VS removal ranged from about 30-55 % (Abbasi et al 2011;Ahring et al 2001;Demirer and Chen 2005;El-Mashad et al 2004;Ghaly 1989;Gungor-Demirci and Demirer 2004;Omar et al 2008;Rico et al 2011;Sung and Santha 2003).…”
Section: Important Parameters For Operating and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last years, several authors investigated the effect on the performance of the AD process by simultaneously treating cattle manure as well as wastes containing high levels of organic matter or energy crops (Alvarez and Liden 2008;Comino et al 2009;Lehtomaki et al 2007;Nasir et al 2012;Yangin-Gomec and Ozturk 2013). This co-digestion method, if co-substrate is used at the appropriate rate, can give interesting results because the synergistic impact indicated by different organic substrates when processed simultaneously (Angelidaki and Ellegaard 2003;Chen et al 2010;Dias et al 2014;El-Mashad et al 2004;Hills and Roberts 1981;Lehtomaki et al 2007;Li et al 2009Li et al , 2011Macias-Corral et al 2008;Mata-Alvarez et al 2000;Rao and Baral 2011;Umetsu et al 2006). For optimal carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and pH diverse substrates are mixed for best biogas production (Khan and Martin 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors investigated the effect of temperature on the SS-AD process and obtained different results. The findings of Mashad et al (2004) indicated that SS-AD under mesophilic conditions exhibited a poor start-up performance, whereas operating SS-AD systems under thermophilic conditions (55.8°C) can accelerate the AD process. Kim et al (2002) found a similar phenomenon of higher biogas yield during anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) at thermophilic conditions than that at mesophilic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaerobic digestion yields depend on several factors [55,56], including temperature [57][58][59][60], organic loading rate [61][62][63][64] and substrate to inoculum ratio [65][66][67]. Under similar operating conditions, substrate characteristics play a key role in defining the amount of biogas that can be recovered by anaerobic digestion, as the theoretical gas yield varies with substrate composition in terms of carbohydrates, proteins and fats, as given in Table 1.…”
Section: Biogas Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%