2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surgical margin width after R0 resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A nationwide survey of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spearman's rank correlation and stepwise logistic regression analysis suggested that ICG fluorescence navigation was an important correlation factor and predictor of a wide margin. As a wide surgical margin should be a target of resection of malignant liver tumors [24][25][26][27], these results indicated that the patients in the ICG-FN group might have a lower postoperative recurrence rate and longer postoperative survival, although this still needs to be verified by long-term follow-up data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spearman's rank correlation and stepwise logistic regression analysis suggested that ICG fluorescence navigation was an important correlation factor and predictor of a wide margin. As a wide surgical margin should be a target of resection of malignant liver tumors [24][25][26][27], these results indicated that the patients in the ICG-FN group might have a lower postoperative recurrence rate and longer postoperative survival, although this still needs to be verified by long-term follow-up data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A meta-analysis of 34 studies involving 11,147 hepatectomy patients concluded that patients with a wide margin (> 10 mm) had a better prognosis, suggesting that this should be one of the goals of hepatectomy [24]. Recent studies also identified that a wide surgical margin is predictive of a better long-term prognosis [25][26][27]. During laparoscopic surgery, the lack of tactile perception of laparoscopic forceps and the 2-dimensional image on the monitor in most centers might affect surgeons' evaluation of the resection range, which could be insufficient to preserve liver parenchyma, resulting in a narrow margin or a positive margin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among single-center studies focused on the effect of resection margins on survival, a small amount demonstrated a significant survival benefit for patients underwent WMH [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. While all three multi-institutional studies and a meta-analysis show a consistent result that WMH could benefit long-term survival in patients with ICC [12,14,15]. In this study, we conducted a PSM analysis using multicenter ICC data, and discovered that patients underwent WMH had better outcomes compared with patients undergoing NMH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Surprisingly, positive resection margins did not have significant influence on postoperative survival, neither in uni- nor multivariable analysis. Of note, the width of the surgical margins was not analyzed in the present study since its relevance is generally discussed controversial: some recent publications pointed out that wide surgical margins (mostly defined as ≥ 10 mm) ensure better overall survival, whereas others reported conflicting results, especially with regard to lymph node–positive patients [ 36 , 37 ]. Other known histopathological factors including high AJCC/UICC stages were confirmed as risk factors in univariable analysis, but only an advanced T stage was identified as an independent risk factor for survival in multivariable analysis in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%