2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly applied surface conditioning feldspathic ceramic is HF acid etching followed by silane application [7][8][9] . The hydrofluoric acid reacts selectively with the silica present on the microstructure of ceramic forming hexafluorsilica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The commonly applied surface conditioning feldspathic ceramic is HF acid etching followed by silane application [7][8][9] . The hydrofluoric acid reacts selectively with the silica present on the microstructure of ceramic forming hexafluorsilica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feldspathic ceramics are classified as acid sensitive materials that suffer from surface degradation by hydrofluoric acid gel (HF). HF application creates a topography favoring micro-mechanical retention [5][6][7][8] due to selective dissolution of glass matrix that is identified as retentive micro-pores, fissures and grooves on the conditioned ceramic surface 4,[8][9][10][11] . The cementation process of a prosthetic restoration is the final step of operative treatment after a series of procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air-abraded groups showed significantly higher retention than as received groups (p<0.001). The increase of retention corresponds to the increase of micro-roughness on the surface of the air-abraded zirconia [53,82]. Surface roughness enhances the micromechanical interlocking of luting agents to ceramic surfaces [86].…”
Section: Influence Of Air-abrasion On Crown Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common treatment options are grinding abrasion with diamond rotary instruments [48][49][50], airborne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide [51][52][53], acid etching [53][54][55], silica coating and silanization [48,[56][57][58] and combinations of these methods.…”
Section: Surface Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest mean shear bond strength obtained was a ceramic surface treated with 50% phosphoric acid bonded to enamel, 2.7±0.8 MPa, and bonded to dentin, 1.5±0.1 MPa. It was observed that 9.5% hydrofluoric acid produced the roughest surface on leucitereinforced ceramics by using a surfanalyzer, which measures surface roughness by calculating the average height of irregularities from mean line within sampling mean length [22]. Reported microtensile bond strength values for lithium disilicate ceramics etched with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 2 min had a higher bond strength, 41.7±6.7 MPa, than those etched with 4.0% acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 min, 19.1±2.6 MPa [23].…”
Section: Bond Strengths With Acid Etchingmentioning
confidence: 99%