2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies have used different mechanical and chemical surface treatments to improve the bond strength of zirconia ceramics to resin cements. 12,15,22,35 Sahafi et al 9 reported that Cojet treatment (silicate-coated particles of 30 mm, silane) most increased the bond strength of zirconia posts to root canal dentin. However, etching with hydrofluoric acid (with or without silane treatment) decreased the bond strength of zirconia posts to root dentin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies have used different mechanical and chemical surface treatments to improve the bond strength of zirconia ceramics to resin cements. 12,15,22,35 Sahafi et al 9 reported that Cojet treatment (silicate-coated particles of 30 mm, silane) most increased the bond strength of zirconia posts to root canal dentin. However, etching with hydrofluoric acid (with or without silane treatment) decreased the bond strength of zirconia posts to root dentin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 The wide range of esthetic post systems, including fiber-reinforced composite resin posts and zirconia ceramic posts, are available. [10][11][12] The use of zirconia as a post and core material was first introduced in 1993 13 because of its excellent mechanical properties, including high chemical stability, modulus of elasticity, and strength, as well as its esthetic properties. [14][15][16][17] The loss of post retention is one of the most common reasons for the failure of post-retained restorations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial dentin bonding was performed as described in Table 1 . The new composite cylinders were cemented to the dentin surfaces using finger pressure 2 4 25 26 by the same researcher, and excess cement was removed with a brush. Samples were then light polymerized (Elipa S10; 3M ESPE) with a light intensity of 1200 mW/cm 2 for 30 seconds on the bonding area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some studies, increasing the diameter of the post does not significantly affect the retention capacities. However, it can increase the strength of the post and thus increase the risk of a root fracture [ 19 ] [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%