2018
DOI: 10.1108/ilt-09-2016-0206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface topography associated with arbitrary velocity direction on the lubrication film thickness in elliptical contacts

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe and observe the effect of surface topography associated with arbitrary directions of rolling and sliding velocities on the performance of lubricating films in elliptical contacts. Design/methodology/approach The most recently published mixed elastohydrodynamic (EHL) model by Pu and Zhu is used. Three different machined rough surfaces are discussed and the correlated inclined angle of surface velocity varies from 0° to 90° in the analyzed cases. These cases are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, because the transverse roughness provides with greater resistance to the entrained flow of lubricant in the line contact EHL, the average film thickness of transverse roughness surface is thicker than that of the longitudinal roughness and the isotropic roughness. 52 In addition, by virtue of the combined effect of film thickness and contact, the coefficient of friction of the transverse roughness surface is slightly smaller than that of the longitudinal roughness and the isotropic roughness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, because the transverse roughness provides with greater resistance to the entrained flow of lubricant in the line contact EHL, the average film thickness of transverse roughness surface is thicker than that of the longitudinal roughness and the isotropic roughness. 52 In addition, by virtue of the combined effect of film thickness and contact, the coefficient of friction of the transverse roughness surface is slightly smaller than that of the longitudinal roughness and the isotropic roughness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh density false( M d false) at each level is defined as M d = 1 Δ α = 1 Δ β, is shown in Table 1. 6668…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang (2019) investigated the influence of real random rough tooth surfaces on the lubrication characteristics of helical gear pairs. The results demonstrated that the friction coefficient and subsurface stress of the honed surfaces with the composite root mean square (RMS) of 0.35 m m are lower than those of the ground surfaces with the composite RMS = 0.6 m m. Pu et al (2018) discussed the effect of directions of rolling and sliding on the lubrication film thickness in elliptical contact under three different rough surfaces in longitudinal, transverse and isotropic. Wang et al (2020) analyzed the transient friction, flash temperature and other lubrication characteristic parameters of spiral bevel gears with rough surfaces and compared these transient behaviors with related steady-state behaviors to reveal the effects of transients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%