1999
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00192-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface roughness on proliferation and alkaline phosphatase expression of rat calvarial cells cultured on polystyrene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
132
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
132
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, too many irregularities presented on the rough surface may make the cell hard to form enough number of stable contacts with the substrate. In the case of fetal rat calvarial cells, a similar trend in proliferation on a smooth and another four rough surfaces (R a : 0.37, 0.81, 1.70, 2.90 µm) was also reported [19], indicating the optimum average roughness of 0.81 µm. Deligianni, et al [20] found that the number of adherent human bone marrow cells per surface unit of Ti alloy increased with the increase of surface roughness in a narrow scope (R a : 0.32, 0.49 and 0.87 µm).…”
Section: Cell Proliferationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…That is, too many irregularities presented on the rough surface may make the cell hard to form enough number of stable contacts with the substrate. In the case of fetal rat calvarial cells, a similar trend in proliferation on a smooth and another four rough surfaces (R a : 0.37, 0.81, 1.70, 2.90 µm) was also reported [19], indicating the optimum average roughness of 0.81 µm. Deligianni, et al [20] found that the number of adherent human bone marrow cells per surface unit of Ti alloy increased with the increase of surface roughness in a narrow scope (R a : 0.32, 0.49 and 0.87 µm).…”
Section: Cell Proliferationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Significantly, these micro-scale geometric features influence osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in cell culture. For example, Hatano"s results [3]show that cellular proliferation levels increase in response to the increase in the degree of surface roughness up to 0.8 μm (Ra) and then decrease to the level observed for the smooth surface. The conclusions of Mustafa [4] indicate that the proliferation and differentiation of cells can be enhanced by increasing the particle size up to 300 m used in the blasting process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional surface texture characterisation parameters such as Ra, Rt and Rz [3] of a surface profile or Sa, Sds and Sdr [4,5] on an areal surface have been used to ascertain the functionality of titanium surfaces and have been proven to be of limited use. However, surfaces are complex entities which cannot be described completely by a single or even a few numerical descriptors [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies showed that the smooth surfaces favor the cellular proliferation [23,24]. However, De Santis et al [25] and Hatano et al [26] observed higher proliferation in cells plated onto roughness surfaces and Rosa and Beloti [27] did not verify the difference in this proliferation under roughness conditions. Although the cellular response in different surfaces is largely researched, the studies are limited by the use of the terms "smooth or rough", that is, surfaces with roughness values that little varies among them.…”
Section: Seven Daysmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This change in the protocol was possible because of the greatest cautions taken during the surgical procedure, the development STEM CELLS BEHAVIOR ON TITANIUM SURFACES MODIFIED BY PLASMA Braz Dent Sci 2012 abr./jun. ; 15 (2) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] of knowledge on the implant biomechanics, the modification in the implant design as well as the improvement of the techniques of modification of the implant surfaces [5]. The surface modification of this material results in a new Dentistry, where it is expected to decrease the non-functional time period of the implant, increase it applicability in alveolar bone with little quality, cause minimum discomfort to patient, and minimize the failure rates [1,[6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%