2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Surface Roughness on Contact Angle Measurement of Nanofluid on Surface of Stainless Steel 304 by Sessile Drop Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreasing of the signal also correlates with the spreading of the liquid. This observation is consistent with study [8] where the decreasing of surface roughness increased the spreading of the liquid. The decrease in the signal with the surface roughness could be due to the role of diffuse reflectance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decreasing of the signal also correlates with the spreading of the liquid. This observation is consistent with study [8] where the decreasing of surface roughness increased the spreading of the liquid. The decrease in the signal with the surface roughness could be due to the role of diffuse reflectance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For rough surfaces, the contact angle becomes dynamic and a local quantity during the spreading of a liquid drop and is a function of the surface roughness and other material properties such as the surface tension and viscosity of the liquids. The influence of the surface roughness on the wetting has also received much focus from researchers as demonstrated in several studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that smaller contact angles provide an early pinch-off during the bubble formation process, thus generating smaller bubbles (Kukizaki and Wada, 2008). Due to the high porosity of the woven stainless steel membrane, contact angle measurements were difficult, but the contact angle was estimated to be ~85 o according to Prajitno et al, 2016. This value is smaller than the measured contact angle for nickel membranes, which is 120 o .…”
Section: Bubble Size Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Wettability and surface energy of steel are affected by both chemical and topographical properties of the native steel. Wenzel 1936 [7] stated that there is a strong relationship between surface roughness, contact angle and wettability of the surface. Additionally, contact angle is an essential parameter for the detection of mass and heat transfer of stainless steels especially those steels that are used as structural materials for nuclear power plants [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%